Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities
Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two "intervention packages". You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder "Interventions"). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned - any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the "ideal" approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project's conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30th March). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students' Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] 2. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey's team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej's team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Mojca and Katja, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP6 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. As leaders of WP8, we would be pleased to contribute to the definition of the activities and to help identify synergies across the different work packages. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 19 mar 2026, alle ore 19:33, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> ha scritto: Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] 2. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Franco, Please find attached our draft of WP8 description for your review, comments and additions related to the policy simulation. Best regards, Loredana
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. FYI Franco, as agreed below the email I sent to Mojca with the template for the WP description. From your slide, task 3.4: Mapping of behavioural determinants across disease areas was provisionally allocated to ICL. Probably we can propose to Amsterdam to lead this activity as WP leader. Best, Loredana Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Oggetto: Z-HEALTH, WP6 - Request for contributions Data: 20 marzo 2026 alle ore 11:27:40 CET A: "Mojca.Gabrijelcic@nijz.si" <Mojca.Gabrijelcic@nijz.si>, "katja.cic@nijz.si" <katja.cic@nijz.si> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Dear Mojca and Katja, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP6 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. As leaders of WP8, we would be pleased to contribute to the definition of the activities and to help identify synergies across the different work packages. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 19 mar 2026, alle ore 19:33, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> ha scritto: Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] 2. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] 2. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] 2. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] 2. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] 2. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] 2. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] 2. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] 2. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Thank you Arnfinn. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 31 mar 2026, alle ore 09:16, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] 2. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Hi Jack, There are two versions of the application on box dated 26.03 and 30.03. We should keep just one version for the the partners to avoid confusion. However, I tried to include Arnfinn contribution in the version 30.03 but I’m not allowed to modify it. So, probably, also the partners will not be able to provide inputs. Best, Loredana Il giorno 31 mar 2026, alle ore 09:16, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] 2. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>
Hi Loredana, The 2603 version is password protected, so only we can edit it. I am confused about the 3003 version. It was not meant to be password protected, and it looks like Arnfinn has edited it, so it must not have been protected. However, I am unable to access the file for editing at the moment. It says that it is “reserved by European Commission”! Has anyone modified the settings? Franco From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:28 To: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Hi Jack, There are two versions of the application on box dated 26.03 and 30.03. We should keep just one version for the the partners to avoid confusion. However, I tried to include Arnfinn contribution in the version 30.03 but I’m not allowed to modify it. So, probably, also the partners will not be able to provide inputs. Best, Loredana Il giorno 31 mar 2026, alle ore 09:16, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. WP4 description in version 3003 is not the latest. Attached the one sent by Arnfinn this morning. However I have not the permission for editing the 2603 version too. Best, Loredana Il giorno 31 mar 2026, alle ore 09:47, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, The 2603 version is password protected, so only we can edit it. I am confused about the 3003 version. It was not meant to be password protected, and it looks like Arnfinn has edited it, so it must not have been protected. However, I am unable to access the file for editing at the moment. It says that it is “reserved by European Commission”! Has anyone modified the settings? Franco From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:28 To: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Hi Jack, There are two versions of the application on box dated 26.03 and 30.03. We should keep just one version for the the partners to avoid confusion. However, I tried to include Arnfinn contribution in the version 30.03 but I’m not allowed to modify it. So, probably, also the partners will not be able to provide inputs. Best, Loredana Il giorno 31 mar 2026, alle ore 09:16, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>
I can access the 2603 version using the password “isinnova”, but the same password does not work for the 3003 file. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:57 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. WP4 description in version 3003 is not the latest. Attached the one sent by Arnfinn this morning. However I have not the permission for editing the 2603 version too. Best, Loredana Il giorno 31 mar 2026, alle ore 09:47, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, The 2603 version is password protected, so only we can edit it. I am confused about the 3003 version. It was not meant to be password protected, and it looks like Arnfinn has edited it, so it must not have been protected. However, I am unable to access the file for editing at the moment. It says that it is “reserved by European Commission”! Has anyone modified the settings? Franco From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:28 To: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Hi Jack, There are two versions of the application on box dated 26.03 and 30.03. We should keep just one version for the the partners to avoid confusion. However, I tried to include Arnfinn contribution in the version 30.03 but I’m not allowed to modify it. So, probably, also the partners will not be able to provide inputs. Best, Loredana Il giorno 31 mar 2026, alle ore 09:16, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>
Hi Loredana. We have created a 3103 version, which should not be password protected. Can you confirm you are able to access it? From: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Sent: 31 March 2026 10:00 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions I can access the 2603 version using the password “isinnova”, but the same password does not work for the 3003 file. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:57 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. WP4 description in version 3003 is not the latest. Attached the one sent by Arnfinn this morning. However I have not the permission for editing the 2603 version too. Best, Loredana Il giorno 31 mar 2026, alle ore 09:47, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, The 2603 version is password protected, so only we can edit it. I am confused about the 3003 version. It was not meant to be password protected, and it looks like Arnfinn has edited it, so it must not have been protected. However, I am unable to access the file for editing at the moment. It says that it is “reserved by European Commission”! Has anyone modified the settings? Franco From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:28 To: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Hi Jack, There are two versions of the application on box dated 26.03 and 30.03. We should keep just one version for the the partners to avoid confusion. However, I tried to include Arnfinn contribution in the version 30.03 but I’m not allowed to modify it. So, probably, also the partners will not be able to provide inputs. Best, Loredana Il giorno 31 mar 2026, alle ore 09:16, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Yes, now I can edit version 3103 Thanks Loredana Il giorno 31 mar 2026, alle ore 10:20, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> ha scritto: Hi Loredana. We have created a 3103 version, which should not be password protected. Can you confirm you are able to access it? From: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 10:00 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions I can access the 2603 version using the password “isinnova”, but the same password does not work for the 3003 file. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:57 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. WP4 description in version 3003 is not the latest. Attached the one sent by Arnfinn this morning. However I have not the permission for editing the 2603 version too. Best, Loredana Il giorno 31 mar 2026, alle ore 09:47, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, The 2603 version is password protected, so only we can edit it. I am confused about the 3003 version. It was not meant to be password protected, and it looks like Arnfinn has edited it, so it must not have been protected. However, I am unable to access the file for editing at the moment. It says that it is “reserved by European Commission”! Has anyone modified the settings? Franco From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:28 To: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Hi Jack, There are two versions of the application on box dated 26.03 and 30.03. We should keep just one version for the the partners to avoid confusion. However, I tried to include Arnfinn contribution in the version 30.03 but I’m not allowed to modify it. So, probably, also the partners will not be able to provide inputs. Best, Loredana Il giorno 31 mar 2026, alle ore 09:16, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we'll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco's email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two "intervention packages". You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder "Interventions"). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned - any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the "ideal" approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project's conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students' Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey's team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej's team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Thank you for this update. I included WP4 in the master copy. Loredana Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 10:12, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>_______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
Ukraine also on board. But I think you have already contacted them for the admin information. They are keen to know about the budget. I told them that we can share some information next Tuesday at the earliest. They asked a few questions about the delivery of the interventions that made me think we should consider more carefully some of the cost items involved. For instance, the medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? I will try to come up with a more detailed plan in the next days, but if you have any suggestions, please, let me know. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Sent: 02 April 2026 15:14 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you for this update. I included WP4 in the master copy. Loredana Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 10:12, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>_______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Hi Franco, apologize in advance for the length of this email, but Giovanna and I have reflected on some elements of the project, also in relation to the budget. Below some considerations: Geographical coverage: It would help us to clarify the relation between partners/countries and domains. If we are not wrong, it seems that some interventions are only national (so one partner will implement interventions in its country) whereas other (e.g. Choice) will work in more countries. Would be possible for you to clarify it (probably using the attached table if it can help). Thank you in advance. Rational of the interventions: some suggestions/questions from our side. * "Medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds?” If I’m not wrong, Choice will deliver the classes in each country of WP4. For each national public agency I would foreseen a budget (other costs) for a “service” - an company that will reimburse the students but also support the organization of the event including translation service (if any), practical organization of the training, sum up of the results, etc. Then, if we got the project, each NPH could decide how to organize the activities nationally. * "How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school?” It will be used to monitor the behavioural dimensions and probably we could consider it as part of the evaluation activities too. * "Who is going to run the mental health counselling website?” The starting point is the Slovenian tool which will be adapted/implemented in other countries. We see the involvement of the Slovenian partner providing the framework/their experience and a main role of the partner implementing the activities at national level (NPH?). NIPH intervention: we read the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to understand the activities. Arnfinn wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: * A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs * Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I’m not sure about what he meant for “school health service coordination offices”. If he consider those people contractualised by NIPH or by the municipalities. Do you agree if I try to clarify this point with Arnfinn to then decide how to consider the corresponding costs and the role of the municipalities in the consortium? Best regards, Loredana Ukraine intervention: - medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? - How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? o App legata agli interventi (da capire quali interventi sono coinvolti). Se si bisogn o WP di valutazione - Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? Upscale of the tool at project level Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 15:24, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> ha scritto: Ukraine also on board. But I think you have already contacted them for the admin information. They are keen to know about the budget. I told them that we can share some information next Tuesday at the earliest. They asked a few questions about the delivery of the interventions that made me think we should consider more carefully some of the cost items involved. For instance, the medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? I will try to come up with a more detailed plan in the next days, but if you have any suggestions, please, let me know. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 02 April 2026 15:14 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you for this update. I included WP4 in the master copy. Loredana Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 10:12, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>_______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. I am very sorry, but the email I sent a few minutes ago was sent by mistake with Arnfinn copied. L Il giorno 3 apr 2026, alle ore 16:19, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> ha scritto: Hi Franco, apologize in advance for the length of this email, but Giovanna and I have reflected on some elements of the project, also in relation to the budget. Below some considerations: Geographical coverage: It would help us to clarify the relation between partners/countries and domains. If we are not wrong, it seems that some interventions are only national (so one partner will implement interventions in its country) whereas other (e.g. Choice) will work in more countries. Would be possible for you to clarify it (probably using the attached table if it can help). Thank you in advance. Rational of the interventions: some suggestions/questions from our side. * "Medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds?” If I’m not wrong, Choice will deliver the classes in each country of WP4. For each national public agency I would foreseen a budget (other costs) for a “service” - an company that will reimburse the students but also support the organization of the event including translation service (if any), practical organization of the training, sum up of the results, etc. Then, if we got the project, each NPH could decide how to organize the activities nationally. * "How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school?” It will be used to monitor the behavioural dimensions and probably we could consider it as part of the evaluation activities too. * "Who is going to run the mental health counselling website?” The starting point is the Slovenian tool which will be adapted/implemented in other countries. We see the involvement of the Slovenian partner providing the framework/their experience and a main role of the partner implementing the activities at national level (NPH?). NIPH intervention: we read the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to understand the activities. Arnfinn wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: * A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs * Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I’m not sure about what he meant for “school health service coordination offices”. If he consider those people contractualised by NIPH or by the municipalities. Do you agree if I try to clarify this point with Arnfinn to then decide how to consider the corresponding costs and the role of the municipalities in the consortium? Best regards, Loredana <Intervention overview_0304.docx> Ukraine intervention: - medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? - How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? o App legata agli interventi (da capire quali interventi sono coinvolti). Se si bisogn o WP di valutazione - Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? Upscale of the tool at project level Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 15:24, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Ukraine also on board. But I think you have already contacted them for the admin information. They are keen to know about the budget. I told them that we can share some information next Tuesday at the earliest. They asked a few questions about the delivery of the interventions that made me think we should consider more carefully some of the cost items involved. For instance, the medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? I will try to come up with a more detailed plan in the next days, but if you have any suggestions, please, let me know. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 02 April 2026 15:14 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you for this update. I included WP4 in the master copy. Loredana Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 10:12, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>_______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
Tnak you, Loredana. You have already included Arnfinn in CC, so he can provide the clarifications you have been asking for in the second part of the message, regarding the intervention in Norway. As for your questions in the first part of the message, please, see my answers below in your message. Franco From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Sent: 03 April 2026 16:20 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>; Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Hi Franco, apologize in advance for the length of this email, but Giovanna and I have reflected on some elements of the project, also in relation to the budget. Below some considerations: Geographical coverage: It would help us to clarify the relation between partners/countries and domains. If we are not wrong, it seems that some interventions are only national (so one partner will implement interventions in its country) whereas other (e.g. Choice) will work in more countries. Would be possible for you to clarify it (probably using the attached table if it can help). Thank you in advance. YES, I WILL CLARIFY IN A SEPARATE EMAIL. Rational of the interventions: some suggestions/questions from our side. * "Medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds?” If I’m not wrong, Choice will deliver the classes in each country of WP4. For each national public agency I would foreseen a budget (other costs) for a “service” - an company that will reimburse the students but also support the organization of the event including translation service (if any), practical organization of the training, sum up of the results, etc. Then, if we got the project, each NPH could decide how to organize the activities nationally. CHOICE WILL ONLY “TRAIN THE TRAINERS”, I.E. THEY WILL TRAIN A GROUP OF MEDICAL STUDENTS IN EACH INTERVENTION COUNTRY, WHO WILL THEN DELIVER THE HEALTH LITERACY PROGRAMME IN THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNTIES. MY QUESTION ABOUT WHERE THE BUDGET SHOULD SIT RELATES TO PAYING THE MEDICAL STUDENTS WHO WILL DELIVER THE HEALTH LITERACY PROGRAMME, NOT TO THE TRAINING PROVIDED BY CHOICE. I THINK THIS BUDGET CAN EITHER BE ASSIGNED TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE OF THE RESPECTIVE COUNTRY, OR TO EMSA. PROBABLY THE FORMER WOULD BE MORE SENSIBLE. * "How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school?” It will be used to monitor the behavioural dimensions and probably we could consider it as part of the evaluation activities too. I DON’T THINK THIS WOULD BE IDEAL. THIS IS REALLY AN INTERVENTION COMPONENT, NOT PART OF THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION. DAMON (NYU) HAS THE KNOW HOW, BUT WE NEED PEOPLE WHO IMPLEMENT IT. AGAIN, PROBABLY SAFEST TO INCLUDE THIS IN THE PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTES’ BUDGETS AT THIS STAGE. * "Who is going to run the mental health counselling website?” The starting point is the Slovenian tool which will be adapted/implemented in other countries. We see the involvement of the Slovenian partner providing the framework/their experience and a main role of the partner implementing the activities at national level (NPH?). YES, NIJZ WILL HAVE A MAJOR ROLE IN THE DESIGN (PART OF WP4), BUT AS EXPLAINED BY MATEJ, RUNNING THE WEBSITE AND PROVIDING COUNSELLING IS A TIME CONSUMING ACTIVITY THAT REQUIRES SPECIALIST INPUT. THIS IS DEFINTELY SOMETHING THAT MUST BE DONE BY THE NATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE. THE QUESTION IS HOW TO QUANTIFY THE STAFF TIME NEEDED. I WILL PROBABLY NEED TO ASK MATEJ. NIPH intervention: we read the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to understand the activities. Arnfinn wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: * A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs * Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I’m not sure about what he meant for “school health service coordination offices”. If he consider those people contractualised by NIPH or by the municipalities. Do you agree if I try to clarify this point with Arnfinn to then decide how to consider the corresponding costs and the role of the municipalities in the consortium? Best regards, Loredana Ukraine intervention: - medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? - How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? o App legata agli interventi (da capire quali interventi sono coinvolti). Se si bisogn o WP di valutazione - Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? Upscale of the tool at project level Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 15:24, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Ukraine also on board. But I think you have already contacted them for the admin information. They are keen to know about the budget. I told them that we can share some information next Tuesday at the earliest. They asked a few questions about the delivery of the interventions that made me think we should consider more carefully some of the cost items involved. For instance, the medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? I will try to come up with a more detailed plan in the next days, but if you have any suggestions, please, let me know. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 02 April 2026 15:14 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you for this update. I included WP4 in the master copy. Loredana Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 10:12, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>_______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Arnfinn, I included you among the recipients of the previous email by mistake (sorry for that), but in fact the last point was specifically intended to clarify an aspect related to the you contribution. Thank you for the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to clarify all key elements. You wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I'm not totally sure about what you meant for “school health service coordination offices”. Are people (or consultants) contractualized by NIPH and working in the municipalities or employees of the two cities working on the project? It will be important to clarify the roles of the municipalities in the consortium and how to allocate the corresponding budget. Thank you in advance for your clarification Best regards, Loredana Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Oggetto: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Data: 3 aprile 2026 alle ore 16:19:30 CEST A: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> Hi Franco, apologize in advance for the length of this email, but Giovanna and I have reflected on some elements of the project, also in relation to the budget. Below some considerations: Geographical coverage: It would help us to clarify the relation between partners/countries and domains. If we are not wrong, it seems that some interventions are only national (so one partner will implement interventions in its country) whereas other (e.g. Choice) will work in more countries. Would be possible for you to clarify it (probably using the attached table if it can help). Thank you in advance. Rational of the interventions: some suggestions/questions from our side. * "Medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds?” If I’m not wrong, Choice will deliver the classes in each country of WP4. For each national public agency I would foreseen a budget (other costs) for a “service” - an company that will reimburse the students but also support the organization of the event including translation service (if any), practical organization of the training, sum up of the results, etc. Then, if we got the project, each NPH could decide how to organize the activities nationally. * "How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school?” It will be used to monitor the behavioural dimensions and probably we could consider it as part of the evaluation activities too. * "Who is going to run the mental health counselling website?” The starting point is the Slovenian tool which will be adapted/implemented in other countries. We see the involvement of the Slovenian partner providing the framework/their experience and a main role of the partner implementing the activities at national level (NPH?). NIPH intervention: we read the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to understand the activities. Arnfinn wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: * A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs * Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I’m not sure about what he meant for “school health service coordination offices”. If he consider those people contractualised by NIPH or by the municipalities. Do you agree if I try to clarify this point with Arnfinn to then decide how to consider the corresponding costs and the role of the municipalities in the consortium? Best regards, Loredana Ukraine intervention: - medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? - How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? o App legata agli interventi (da capire quali interventi sono coinvolti). Se si bisogn o WP di valutazione - Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? Upscale of the tool at project level Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 15:24, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Ukraine also on board. But I think you have already contacted them for the admin information. They are keen to know about the budget. I told them that we can share some information next Tuesday at the earliest. They asked a few questions about the delivery of the interventions that made me think we should consider more carefully some of the cost items involved. For instance, the medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? I will try to come up with a more detailed plan in the next days, but if you have any suggestions, please, let me know. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 02 April 2026 15:14 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you for this update. I included WP4 in the master copy. Loredana Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 10:12, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>_______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana NASKO is a part of NIPH. The school health services are located in the municipalities and do not have any formal links with us. I am not sure if “school health service coordination office” is the correct translation is, but the coordination office will be the main office for the school health services which are located in the municipality center, often conjunction with the other parts of the health sector. When students meet with the school health nurse, however, that will be at offices at schools where the school health nurse often have a local office at their disposal. The school health services office (and the nurses) are very busy and often work under time pressure. To be able to get them involved it is crucial that the acitivities we are offering are within the scope of acivities they are supposed to do (as described in the national guidelines), but we aslo need to provide them with resources or else I don't think that we will get them on board. I have not been in contact with them yet, but I thought that 9PMs would potentially cover most of a school year. I am not sure what the best thing would be regarding the administrative formalities given the short timeline. I think that it easily could be some bureaucracy related to onboarding them as partners, eventually. Would it be an option to write this in as two planned sub-contracts with two (not yet named) municipalities? Best regards Arnfinn Fra: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Sendt: fredag 3. april 2026 19:47 Til: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> Kopi: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Emne: Fwd: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Arnfinn, I included you among the recipients of the previous email by mistake (sorry for that), but in fact the last point was specifically intended to clarify an aspect related to the you contribution. Thank you for the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to clarify all key elements. You wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I'm not totally sure about what you meant for “school health service coordination offices”. Are people (or consultants) contractualized by NIPH and working in the municipalities or employees of the two cities working on the project? It will be important to clarify the roles of the municipalities in the consortium and how to allocate the corresponding budget. Thank you in advance for your clarification Best regards, Loredana Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Oggetto: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Data: 3 aprile 2026 alle ore 16:19:30 CEST A: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Hi Franco, apologize in advance for the length of this email, but Giovanna and I have reflected on some elements of the project, also in relation to the budget. Below some considerations: Geographical coverage: It would help us to clarify the relation between partners/countries and domains. If we are not wrong, it seems that some interventions are only national (so one partner will implement interventions in its country) whereas other (e.g. Choice) will work in more countries. Would be possible for you to clarify it (probably using the attached table if it can help). Thank you in advance. Rational of the interventions: some suggestions/questions from our side. * "Medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds?” If I’m not wrong, Choice will deliver the classes in each country of WP4. For each national public agency I would foreseen a budget (other costs) for a “service” - an company that will reimburse the students but also support the organization of the event including translation service (if any), practical organization of the training, sum up of the results, etc. Then, if we got the project, each NPH could decide how to organize the activities nationally. * "How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school?” It will be used to monitor the behavioural dimensions and probably we could consider it as part of the evaluation activities too. * "Who is going to run the mental health counselling website?” The starting point is the Slovenian tool which will be adapted/implemented in other countries. We see the involvement of the Slovenian partner providing the framework/their experience and a main role of the partner implementing the activities at national level (NPH?). NIPH intervention: we read the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to understand the activities. Arnfinn wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: * A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs * Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I’m not sure about what he meant for “school health service coordination offices”. If he consider those people contractualised by NIPH or by the municipalities. Do you agree if I try to clarify this point with Arnfinn to then decide how to consider the corresponding costs and the role of the municipalities in the consortium? Best regards, Loredana Ukraine intervention: - medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? - How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? o App legata agli interventi (da capire quali interventi sono coinvolti). Se si bisogn o WP di valutazione - Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? Upscale of the tool at project level Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 15:24, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Ukraine also on board. But I think you have already contacted them for the admin information. They are keen to know about the budget. I told them that we can share some information next Tuesday at the earliest. They asked a few questions about the delivery of the interventions that made me think we should consider more carefully some of the cost items involved. For instance, the medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? I will try to come up with a more detailed plan in the next days, but if you have any suggestions, please, let me know. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 02 April 2026 15:14 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you for this update. I included WP4 in the master copy. Loredana Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 10:12, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>_______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Regarding the involvement of the two municipalities as I suggested, I need to get in contact with them before we can mention them in the proposal. Before I do so, I need to provide them with our expectations and what they can expect as resources (roughly). Do you think that this is OK to do now, or do I need to await your confirmation that this is OK? An alternative could be to not include the specific names of the two municipalities, but just state that the municipalities will be recruited when the proposal is approved, eventually. Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2026 19:47 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: Fwd: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Arnfinn, I included you among the recipients of the previous email by mistake (sorry for that), but in fact the last point was specifically intended to clarify an aspect related to the you contribution. Thank you for the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to clarify all key elements. You wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I'm not totally sure about what you meant for “school health service coordination offices”. Are people (or consultants) contractualized by NIPH and working in the municipalities or employees of the two cities working on the project? It will be important to clarify the roles of the municipalities in the consortium and how to allocate the corresponding budget. Thank you in advance for your clarification Best regards, Loredana Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Oggetto: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Data: 3 aprile 2026 alle ore 16:19:30 CEST A: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> Hi Franco, apologize in advance for the length of this email, but Giovanna and I have reflected on some elements of the project, also in relation to the budget. Below some considerations: Geographical coverage: It would help us to clarify the relation between partners/countries and domains. If we are not wrong, it seems that some interventions are only national (so one partner will implement interventions in its country) whereas other (e.g. Choice) will work in more countries. Would be possible for you to clarify it (probably using the attached table if it can help). Thank you in advance. Rational of the interventions: some suggestions/questions from our side. * "Medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds?” If I’m not wrong, Choice will deliver the classes in each country of WP4. For each national public agency I would foreseen a budget (other costs) for a “service” - an company that will reimburse the students but also support the organization of the event including translation service (if any), practical organization of the training, sum up of the results, etc. Then, if we got the project, each NPH could decide how to organize the activities nationally. * "How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school?” It will be used to monitor the behavioural dimensions and probably we could consider it as part of the evaluation activities too. * "Who is going to run the mental health counselling website?” The starting point is the Slovenian tool which will be adapted/implemented in other countries. We see the involvement of the Slovenian partner providing the framework/their experience and a main role of the partner implementing the activities at national level (NPH?). NIPH intervention: we read the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to understand the activities. Arnfinn wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: * A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs * Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I’m not sure about what he meant for “school health service coordination offices”. If he consider those people contractualised by NIPH or by the municipalities. Do you agree if I try to clarify this point with Arnfinn to then decide how to consider the corresponding costs and the role of the municipalities in the consortium? Best regards, Loredana Ukraine intervention: - medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? - How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? o App legata agli interventi (da capire quali interventi sono coinvolti). Se si bisogn o WP di valutazione - Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? Upscale of the tool at project level Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 15:24, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Ukraine also on board. But I think you have already contacted them for the admin information. They are keen to know about the budget. I told them that we can share some information next Tuesday at the earliest. They asked a few questions about the delivery of the interventions that made me think we should consider more carefully some of the cost items involved. For instance, the medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? I will try to come up with a more detailed plan in the next days, but if you have any suggestions, please, let me know. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 02 April 2026 15:14 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you for this update. I included WP4 in the master copy. Loredana Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 10:12, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>_______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
Dear Arnfinn, Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this. The more precisely we describe our plans in the proposal, the more credible it will look to reviewers. So, if we could get the two municipalities' agreement to participate, this would add strength to the proposal. If they need resources to be involved, we can try to quantify what would be available, but it would be helpful to know what the resources would be needed for. You mentioned in your outline 9 PMs for a coordinator in each municipality. Do you envisage more resources to be needed than this? As for expectations, do you need any inputs from us in setting out what would be expected from the municipalities? Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Sent: 07 April 2026 12:57 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Regarding the involvement of the two municipalities as I suggested, I need to get in contact with them before we can mention them in the proposal. Before I do so, I need to provide them with our expectations and what they can expect as resources (roughly). Do you think that this is OK to do now, or do I need to await your confirmation that this is OK? An alternative could be to not include the specific names of the two municipalities, but just state that the municipalities will be recruited when the proposal is approved, eventually. Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2026 19:47 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Fwd: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Arnfinn, I included you among the recipients of the previous email by mistake (sorry for that), but in fact the last point was specifically intended to clarify an aspect related to the you contribution. Thank you for the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to clarify all key elements. You wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities - 6 PMs A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality - 9 PMs A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality - 9 PMs Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)" I'm not totally sure about what you meant for "school health service coordination offices". Are people (or consultants) contractualized by NIPH and working in the municipalities or employees of the two cities working on the project? It will be important to clarify the roles of the municipalities in the consortium and how to allocate the corresponding budget. Thank you in advance for your clarification Best regards, Loredana Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Oggetto: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Data: 3 aprile 2026 alle ore 16:19:30 CEST A: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Hi Franco, apologize in advance for the length of this email, but Giovanna and I have reflected on some elements of the project, also in relation to the budget. Below some considerations: Geographical coverage: It would help us to clarify the relation between partners/countries and domains. If we are not wrong, it seems that some interventions are only national (so one partner will implement interventions in its country) whereas other (e.g. Choice) will work in more countries. Would be possible for you to clarify it (probably using the attached table if it can help). Thank you in advance. Rational of the interventions: some suggestions/questions from our side. * "Medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds?" If I'm not wrong, Choice will deliver the classes in each country of WP4. For each national public agency I would foreseen a budget (other costs) for a "service" - an company that will reimburse the students but also support the organization of the event including translation service (if any), practical organization of the training, sum up of the results, etc. Then, if we got the project, each NPH could decide how to organize the activities nationally. * "How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school?" It will be used to monitor the behavioural dimensions and probably we could consider it as part of the evaluation activities too. * "Who is going to run the mental health counselling website?" The starting point is the Slovenian tool which will be adapted/implemented in other countries. We see the involvement of the Slovenian partner providing the framework/their experience and a main role of the partner implementing the activities at national level (NPH?). NIPH intervention: we read the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to understand the activities. Arnfinn wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: * A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities - 6 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality - 9 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality - 9 PMs * Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)" I'm not sure about what he meant for "school health service coordination offices". If he consider those people contractualised by NIPH or by the municipalities. Do you agree if I try to clarify this point with Arnfinn to then decide how to consider the corresponding costs and the role of the municipalities in the consortium? Best regards, Loredana Ukraine intervention: - medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? - How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? o App legata agli interventi (da capire quali interventi sono coinvolti). Se si bisogn o WP di valutazione - Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? Upscale of the tool at project level Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 15:24, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Ukraine also on board. But I think you have already contacted them for the admin information. They are keen to know about the budget. I told them that we can share some information next Tuesday at the earliest. They asked a few questions about the delivery of the interventions that made me think we should consider more carefully some of the cost items involved. For instance, the medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? I will try to come up with a more detailed plan in the next days, but if you have any suggestions, please, let me know. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 02 April 2026 15:14 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you for this update. I included WP4 in the master copy. Loredana Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 10:12, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we'll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco's email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two "intervention packages". You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder "Interventions"). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned - any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? 1. What I see as the "ideal" approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. 2. It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project's conceptual framework. 3. The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students' Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey's team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej's team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>_______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Franco and thanks I will get in contact with them tomorrow Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 18:01 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>; Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: RE: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Arnfinn, Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this. The more precisely we describe our plans in the proposal, the more credible it will look to reviewers. So, if we could get the two municipalities’ agreement to participate, this would add strength to the proposal. If they need resources to be involved, we can try to quantify what would be available, but it would be helpful to know what the resources would be needed for. You mentioned in your outline 9 PMs for a coordinator in each municipality. Do you envisage more resources to be needed than this? As for expectations, do you need any inputs from us in setting out what would be expected from the municipalities? Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Sent: 07 April 2026 12:57 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Regarding the involvement of the two municipalities as I suggested, I need to get in contact with them before we can mention them in the proposal. Before I do so, I need to provide them with our expectations and what they can expect as resources (roughly). Do you think that this is OK to do now, or do I need to await your confirmation that this is OK? An alternative could be to not include the specific names of the two municipalities, but just state that the municipalities will be recruited when the proposal is approved, eventually. Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2026 19:47 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Fwd: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Arnfinn, I included you among the recipients of the previous email by mistake (sorry for that), but in fact the last point was specifically intended to clarify an aspect related to the you contribution. Thank you for the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to clarify all key elements. You wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I'm not totally sure about what you meant for “school health service coordination offices”. Are people (or consultants) contractualized by NIPH and working in the municipalities or employees of the two cities working on the project? It will be important to clarify the roles of the municipalities in the consortium and how to allocate the corresponding budget. Thank you in advance for your clarification Best regards, Loredana Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Oggetto: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Data: 3 aprile 2026 alle ore 16:19:30 CEST A: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Hi Franco, apologize in advance for the length of this email, but Giovanna and I have reflected on some elements of the project, also in relation to the budget. Below some considerations: Geographical coverage: It would help us to clarify the relation between partners/countries and domains. If we are not wrong, it seems that some interventions are only national (so one partner will implement interventions in its country) whereas other (e.g. Choice) will work in more countries. Would be possible for you to clarify it (probably using the attached table if it can help). Thank you in advance. Rational of the interventions: some suggestions/questions from our side. · "Medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds?” If I’m not wrong, Choice will deliver the classes in each country of WP4. For each national public agency I would foreseen a budget (other costs) for a “service” - an company that will reimburse the students but also support the organization of the event including translation service (if any), practical organization of the training, sum up of the results, etc. Then, if we got the project, each NPH could decide how to organize the activities nationally. * "How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school?” It will be used to monitor the behavioural dimensions and probably we could consider it as part of the evaluation activities too. * "Who is going to run the mental health counselling website?” The starting point is the Slovenian tool which will be adapted/implemented in other countries. We see the involvement of the Slovenian partner providing the framework/their experience and a main role of the partner implementing the activities at national level (NPH?). NIPH intervention: we read the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to understand the activities. Arnfinn wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: · A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs · A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs · A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs · Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I’m not sure about what he meant for “school health service coordination offices”. If he consider those people contractualised by NIPH or by the municipalities. Do you agree if I try to clarify this point with Arnfinn to then decide how to consider the corresponding costs and the role of the municipalities in the consortium? Best regards, Loredana Ukraine intervention: - medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? - How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? o App legata agli interventi (da capire quali interventi sono coinvolti). Se si bisogn o WP di valutazione - Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? Upscale of the tool at project level Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 15:24, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Ukraine also on board. But I think you have already contacted them for the admin information. They are keen to know about the budget. I told them that we can share some information next Tuesday at the earliest. They asked a few questions about the delivery of the interventions that made me think we should consider more carefully some of the cost items involved. For instance, the medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? I will try to come up with a more detailed plan in the next days, but if you have any suggestions, please, let me know. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 02 April 2026 15:14 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you for this update. I included WP4 in the master copy. Loredana Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 10:12, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? 1. What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. 2. It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. 3. The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>_______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Franco I have had dialogue with both Bergen and Trondheim municipalities and they are both positive to take part as intervention sites. I will have new meetings with them the coming days. They will check whether it is possible for them to sign them as partners at this short notice, but at least we can state that we have established a collaboration with them. I can try to push for them to join as partners, but are there alternative that would secure them resources? Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 18:01 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>; Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: RE: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Arnfinn, Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this. The more precisely we describe our plans in the proposal, the more credible it will look to reviewers. So, if we could get the two municipalities’ agreement to participate, this would add strength to the proposal. If they need resources to be involved, we can try to quantify what would be available, but it would be helpful to know what the resources would be needed for. You mentioned in your outline 9 PMs for a coordinator in each municipality. Do you envisage more resources to be needed than this? As for expectations, do you need any inputs from us in setting out what would be expected from the municipalities? Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Sent: 07 April 2026 12:57 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Regarding the involvement of the two municipalities as I suggested, I need to get in contact with them before we can mention them in the proposal. Before I do so, I need to provide them with our expectations and what they can expect as resources (roughly). Do you think that this is OK to do now, or do I need to await your confirmation that this is OK? An alternative could be to not include the specific names of the two municipalities, but just state that the municipalities will be recruited when the proposal is approved, eventually. Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2026 19:47 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Fwd: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Arnfinn, I included you among the recipients of the previous email by mistake (sorry for that), but in fact the last point was specifically intended to clarify an aspect related to the you contribution. Thank you for the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to clarify all key elements. You wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I'm not totally sure about what you meant for “school health service coordination offices”. Are people (or consultants) contractualized by NIPH and working in the municipalities or employees of the two cities working on the project? It will be important to clarify the roles of the municipalities in the consortium and how to allocate the corresponding budget. Thank you in advance for your clarification Best regards, Loredana Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Oggetto: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Data: 3 aprile 2026 alle ore 16:19:30 CEST A: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Hi Franco, apologize in advance for the length of this email, but Giovanna and I have reflected on some elements of the project, also in relation to the budget. Below some considerations: Geographical coverage: It would help us to clarify the relation between partners/countries and domains. If we are not wrong, it seems that some interventions are only national (so one partner will implement interventions in its country) whereas other (e.g. Choice) will work in more countries. Would be possible for you to clarify it (probably using the attached table if it can help). Thank you in advance. Rational of the interventions: some suggestions/questions from our side. · "Medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds?” If I’m not wrong, Choice will deliver the classes in each country of WP4. For each national public agency I would foreseen a budget (other costs) for a “service” - an company that will reimburse the students but also support the organization of the event including translation service (if any), practical organization of the training, sum up of the results, etc. Then, if we got the project, each NPH could decide how to organize the activities nationally. * "How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school?” It will be used to monitor the behavioural dimensions and probably we could consider it as part of the evaluation activities too. * "Who is going to run the mental health counselling website?” The starting point is the Slovenian tool which will be adapted/implemented in other countries. We see the involvement of the Slovenian partner providing the framework/their experience and a main role of the partner implementing the activities at national level (NPH?). NIPH intervention: we read the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to understand the activities. Arnfinn wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: · A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs · A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs · A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs · Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I’m not sure about what he meant for “school health service coordination offices”. If he consider those people contractualised by NIPH or by the municipalities. Do you agree if I try to clarify this point with Arnfinn to then decide how to consider the corresponding costs and the role of the municipalities in the consortium? Best regards, Loredana Ukraine intervention: - medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? - How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? o App legata agli interventi (da capire quali interventi sono coinvolti). Se si bisogn o WP di valutazione - Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? Upscale of the tool at project level Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 15:24, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Ukraine also on board. But I think you have already contacted them for the admin information. They are keen to know about the budget. I told them that we can share some information next Tuesday at the earliest. They asked a few questions about the delivery of the interventions that made me think we should consider more carefully some of the cost items involved. For instance, the medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? I will try to come up with a more detailed plan in the next days, but if you have any suggestions, please, let me know. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 02 April 2026 15:14 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you for this update. I included WP4 in the master copy. Loredana Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 10:12, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? 1. What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. 2. It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. 3. The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>_______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
Thank you, Arnfinn. I would like to have Loredana's views on this. My feeling is that a sub-contract would be a better option in this case, but Loredana knows better. From: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> Sent: 08 April 2026 14:56 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>; Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Franco I have had dialogue with both Bergen and Trondheim municipalities and they are both positive to take part as intervention sites. I will have new meetings with them the coming days. They will check whether it is possible for them to sign them as partners at this short notice, but at least we can state that we have established a collaboration with them. I can try to push for them to join as partners, but are there alternative that would secure them resources? Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 18:01 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>>; Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: RE: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Arnfinn, Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this. The more precisely we describe our plans in the proposal, the more credible it will look to reviewers. So, if we could get the two municipalities' agreement to participate, this would add strength to the proposal. If they need resources to be involved, we can try to quantify what would be available, but it would be helpful to know what the resources would be needed for. You mentioned in your outline 9 PMs for a coordinator in each municipality. Do you envisage more resources to be needed than this? As for expectations, do you need any inputs from us in setting out what would be expected from the municipalities? Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 07 April 2026 12:57 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Regarding the involvement of the two municipalities as I suggested, I need to get in contact with them before we can mention them in the proposal. Before I do so, I need to provide them with our expectations and what they can expect as resources (roughly). Do you think that this is OK to do now, or do I need to await your confirmation that this is OK? An alternative could be to not include the specific names of the two municipalities, but just state that the municipalities will be recruited when the proposal is approved, eventually. Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2026 19:47 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Fwd: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Arnfinn, I included you among the recipients of the previous email by mistake (sorry for that), but in fact the last point was specifically intended to clarify an aspect related to the you contribution. Thank you for the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to clarify all key elements. You wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities - 6 PMs A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality - 9 PMs A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality - 9 PMs Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)" I'm not totally sure about what you meant for "school health service coordination offices". Are people (or consultants) contractualized by NIPH and working in the municipalities or employees of the two cities working on the project? It will be important to clarify the roles of the municipalities in the consortium and how to allocate the corresponding budget. Thank you in advance for your clarification Best regards, Loredana Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Oggetto: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Data: 3 aprile 2026 alle ore 16:19:30 CEST A: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Hi Franco, apologize in advance for the length of this email, but Giovanna and I have reflected on some elements of the project, also in relation to the budget. Below some considerations: Geographical coverage: It would help us to clarify the relation between partners/countries and domains. If we are not wrong, it seems that some interventions are only national (so one partner will implement interventions in its country) whereas other (e.g. Choice) will work in more countries. Would be possible for you to clarify it (probably using the attached table if it can help). Thank you in advance. Rational of the interventions: some suggestions/questions from our side. * "Medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds?" If I'm not wrong, Choice will deliver the classes in each country of WP4. For each national public agency I would foreseen a budget (other costs) for a "service" - an company that will reimburse the students but also support the organization of the event including translation service (if any), practical organization of the training, sum up of the results, etc. Then, if we got the project, each NPH could decide how to organize the activities nationally. * "How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school?" It will be used to monitor the behavioural dimensions and probably we could consider it as part of the evaluation activities too. * "Who is going to run the mental health counselling website?" The starting point is the Slovenian tool which will be adapted/implemented in other countries. We see the involvement of the Slovenian partner providing the framework/their experience and a main role of the partner implementing the activities at national level (NPH?). NIPH intervention: we read the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to understand the activities. Arnfinn wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: * A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities - 6 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality - 9 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality - 9 PMs * Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)" I'm not sure about what he meant for "school health service coordination offices". If he consider those people contractualised by NIPH or by the municipalities. Do you agree if I try to clarify this point with Arnfinn to then decide how to consider the corresponding costs and the role of the municipalities in the consortium? Best regards, Loredana Ukraine intervention: - medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? - How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? o App legata agli interventi (da capire quali interventi sono coinvolti). Se si bisogn o WP di valutazione - Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? Upscale of the tool at project level Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 15:24, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Ukraine also on board. But I think you have already contacted them for the admin information. They are keen to know about the budget. I told them that we can share some information next Tuesday at the earliest. They asked a few questions about the delivery of the interventions that made me think we should consider more carefully some of the cost items involved. For instance, the medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? I will try to come up with a more detailed plan in the next days, but if you have any suggestions, please, let me know. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 02 April 2026 15:14 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you for this update. I included WP4 in the master copy. Loredana Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 10:12, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we'll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco's email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two "intervention packages". You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder "Interventions"). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned - any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? 1. What I see as the "ideal" approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. 2. It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project's conceptual framework. 3. The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students' Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey's team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej's team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>_______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Franco and Arnfinn, Indeed, subcontract is the best option. We’ll allocate a subcontract under NIPH budget to reimburse the work of the municipalities in the project. It would be important (in the subcontract corresponding box) specify the specific tasks of the workplan where the municipalities are involved and provide information about the estimated budget. So, if you can provide information about costs to be allocated, task numbers and a short description of the work to be done it will be great. I can support with some examples if needed. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 8 apr 2026, alle ore 16:04, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> ha scritto: Thank you, Arnfinn. I would like to have Loredana’s views on this. My feeling is that a sub-contract would be a better option in this case, but Loredana knows better. From: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Sent: 08 April 2026 14:56 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>>; Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Franco I have had dialogue with both Bergen and Trondheim municipalities and they are both positive to take part as intervention sites. I will have new meetings with them the coming days. They will check whether it is possible for them to sign them as partners at this short notice, but at least we can state that we have established a collaboration with them. I can try to push for them to join as partners, but are there alternative that would secure them resources? Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 18:01 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>>; Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: RE: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Arnfinn, Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this. The more precisely we describe our plans in the proposal, the more credible it will look to reviewers. So, if we could get the two municipalities’ agreement to participate, this would add strength to the proposal. If they need resources to be involved, we can try to quantify what would be available, but it would be helpful to know what the resources would be needed for. You mentioned in your outline 9 PMs for a coordinator in each municipality. Do you envisage more resources to be needed than this? As for expectations, do you need any inputs from us in setting out what would be expected from the municipalities? Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 07 April 2026 12:57 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Regarding the involvement of the two municipalities as I suggested, I need to get in contact with them before we can mention them in the proposal. Before I do so, I need to provide them with our expectations and what they can expect as resources (roughly). Do you think that this is OK to do now, or do I need to await your confirmation that this is OK? An alternative could be to not include the specific names of the two municipalities, but just state that the municipalities will be recruited when the proposal is approved, eventually. Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2026 19:47 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Fwd: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Arnfinn, I included you among the recipients of the previous email by mistake (sorry for that), but in fact the last point was specifically intended to clarify an aspect related to the you contribution. Thank you for the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to clarify all key elements. You wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I'm not totally sure about what you meant for “school health service coordination offices”. Are people (or consultants) contractualized by NIPH and working in the municipalities or employees of the two cities working on the project? It will be important to clarify the roles of the municipalities in the consortium and how to allocate the corresponding budget. Thank you in advance for your clarification Best regards, Loredana Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Oggetto: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Data: 3 aprile 2026 alle ore 16:19:30 CEST A: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Hi Franco, apologize in advance for the length of this email, but Giovanna and I have reflected on some elements of the project, also in relation to the budget. Below some considerations: Geographical coverage: It would help us to clarify the relation between partners/countries and domains. If we are not wrong, it seems that some interventions are only national (so one partner will implement interventions in its country) whereas other (e.g. Choice) will work in more countries. Would be possible for you to clarify it (probably using the attached table if it can help). Thank you in advance. Rational of the interventions: some suggestions/questions from our side. • "Medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds?” If I’m not wrong, Choice will deliver the classes in each country of WP4. For each national public agency I would foreseen a budget (other costs) for a “service” - an company that will reimburse the students but also support the organization of the event including translation service (if any), practical organization of the training, sum up of the results, etc. Then, if we got the project, each NPH could decide how to organize the activities nationally. * "How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school?” It will be used to monitor the behavioural dimensions and probably we could consider it as part of the evaluation activities too. * "Who is going to run the mental health counselling website?” The starting point is the Slovenian tool which will be adapted/implemented in other countries. We see the involvement of the Slovenian partner providing the framework/their experience and a main role of the partner implementing the activities at national level (NPH?). NIPH intervention: we read the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to understand the activities. Arnfinn wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: • A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs • A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs • A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs • Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I’m not sure about what he meant for “school health service coordination offices”. If he consider those people contractualised by NIPH or by the municipalities. Do you agree if I try to clarify this point with Arnfinn to then decide how to consider the corresponding costs and the role of the municipalities in the consortium? Best regards, Loredana Ukraine intervention: - medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? - How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? o App legata agli interventi (da capire quali interventi sono coinvolti). Se si bisogn o WP di valutazione - Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? Upscale of the tool at project level Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 15:24, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Ukraine also on board. But I think you have already contacted them for the admin information. They are keen to know about the budget. I told them that we can share some information next Tuesday at the earliest. They asked a few questions about the delivery of the interventions that made me think we should consider more carefully some of the cost items involved. For instance, the medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? I will try to come up with a more detailed plan in the next days, but if you have any suggestions, please, let me know. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 02 April 2026 15:14 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you for this update. I included WP4 in the master copy. Loredana Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 10:12, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisagedtransitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence.Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits.Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions asproposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? 1. What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. 2. It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. 3. The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>_______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana and thanks If you have an example at hand, it would be helpful Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 16:10 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>; Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Franco and Arnfinn, Indeed, subcontract is the best option. We’ll allocate a subcontract under NIPH budget to reimburse the work of the municipalities in the project. It would be important (in the subcontract corresponding box) specify the specific tasks of the workplan where the municipalities are involved and provide information about the estimated budget. So, if you can provide information about costs to be allocated, task numbers and a short description of the work to be done it will be great. I can support with some examples if needed. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 8 apr 2026, alle ore 16:04, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> ha scritto: Thank you, Arnfinn. I would like to have Loredana’s views on this. My feeling is that a sub-contract would be a better option in this case, but Loredana knows better. From: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Sent: 08 April 2026 14:56 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>>; Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Franco I have had dialogue with both Bergen and Trondheim municipalities and they are both positive to take part as intervention sites. I will have new meetings with them the coming days. They will check whether it is possible for them to sign them as partners at this short notice, but at least we can state that we have established a collaboration with them. I can try to push for them to join as partners, but are there alternative that would secure them resources? Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 18:01 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>>; Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: RE: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Arnfinn, Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this. The more precisely we describe our plans in the proposal, the more credible it will look to reviewers. So, if we could get the two municipalities’ agreement to participate, this would add strength to the proposal. If they need resources to be involved, we can try to quantify what would be available, but it would be helpful to know what the resources would be needed for. You mentioned in your outline 9 PMs for a coordinator in each municipality. Do you envisage more resources to be needed than this? As for expectations, do you need any inputs from us in setting out what would be expected from the municipalities? Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 07 April 2026 12:57 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Regarding the involvement of the two municipalities as I suggested, I need to get in contact with them before we can mention them in the proposal. Before I do so, I need to provide them with our expectations and what they can expect as resources (roughly). Do you think that this is OK to do now, or do I need to await your confirmation that this is OK? An alternative could be to not include the specific names of the two municipalities, but just state that the municipalities will be recruited when the proposal is approved, eventually. Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2026 19:47 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Fwd: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Arnfinn, I included you among the recipients of the previous email by mistake (sorry for that), but in fact the last point was specifically intended to clarify an aspect related to the you contribution. Thank you for the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to clarify all key elements. You wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I'm not totally sure about what you meant for “school health service coordination offices”. Are people (or consultants) contractualized by NIPH and working in the municipalities or employees of the two cities working on the project? It will be important to clarify the roles of the municipalities in the consortium and how to allocate the corresponding budget. Thank you in advance for your clarification Best regards, Loredana Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Oggetto: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Data: 3 aprile 2026 alle ore 16:19:30 CEST A: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Hi Franco, apologize in advance for the length of this email, but Giovanna and I have reflected on some elements of the project, also in relation to the budget. Below some considerations: Geographical coverage: It would help us to clarify the relation between partners/countries and domains. If we are not wrong, it seems that some interventions are only national (so one partner will implement interventions in its country) whereas other (e.g. Choice) will work in more countries. Would be possible for you to clarify it (probably using the attached table if it can help). Thank you in advance. Rational of the interventions: some suggestions/questions from our side. • "Medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds?” If I’m not wrong, Choice will deliver the classes in each country of WP4. For each national public agency I would foreseen a budget (other costs) for a “service” - an company that will reimburse the students but also support the organization of the event including translation service (if any), practical organization of the training, sum up of the results, etc. Then, if we got the project, each NPH could decide how to organize the activities nationally. * "How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school?” It will be used to monitor the behavioural dimensions and probably we could consider it as part of the evaluation activities too. * "Who is going to run the mental health counselling website?” The starting point is the Slovenian tool which will be adapted/implemented in other countries. We see the involvement of the Slovenian partner providing the framework/their experience and a main role of the partner implementing the activities at national level (NPH?). NIPH intervention: we read the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to understand the activities. Arnfinn wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: • A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs • A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs • A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs • Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I’m not sure about what he meant for “school health service coordination offices”. If he consider those people contractualised by NIPH or by the municipalities. Do you agree if I try to clarify this point with Arnfinn to then decide how to consider the corresponding costs and the role of the municipalities in the consortium? Best regards, Loredana Ukraine intervention: - medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? - How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? o App legata agli interventi (da capire quali interventi sono coinvolti). Se si bisogn o WP di valutazione - Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? Upscale of the tool at project level Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 15:24, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Ukraine also on board. But I think you have already contacted them for the admin information. They are keen to know about the budget. I told them that we can share some information next Tuesday at the earliest. They asked a few questions about the delivery of the interventions that made me think we should consider more carefully some of the cost items involved. For instance, the medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? I will try to come up with a more detailed plan in the next days, but if you have any suggestions, please, let me know. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 02 April 2026 15:14 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you for this update. I included WP4 in the master copy. Loredana Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 10:12, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisagedtransitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence.Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits.Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions asproposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? 1. What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. 2. It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. 3. The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>_______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here are some inputs from me, sorry for the delay. I will need more inputs from the other partners involved, and I don't have the complete overview over which partners that are going to be involved. I was also unsure how to structure the task descriptions before we enter the content. But I wonder if it would work to put each intervention in as a task? What do you think? Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2026 11:30 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] 2. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
participants (3)
-
Arnfinn Helleve
-
Loredana Marmora
-
Sassi, Franco