CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Arnfinn, I included you among the recipients of the previous email by mistake (sorry for that), but in fact the last point was specifically intended to clarify an aspect related to the you contribution. Thank you for the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to clarify all key elements. You wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I'm not totally sure about what you meant for “school health service coordination offices”. Are people (or consultants) contractualized by NIPH and working in the municipalities or employees of the two cities working on the project? It will be important to clarify the roles of the municipalities in the consortium and how to allocate the corresponding budget. Thank you in advance for your clarification Best regards, Loredana Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Oggetto: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Data: 3 aprile 2026 alle ore 16:19:30 CEST A: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no> Hi Franco, apologize in advance for the length of this email, but Giovanna and I have reflected on some elements of the project, also in relation to the budget. Below some considerations: Geographical coverage: It would help us to clarify the relation between partners/countries and domains. If we are not wrong, it seems that some interventions are only national (so one partner will implement interventions in its country) whereas other (e.g. Choice) will work in more countries. Would be possible for you to clarify it (probably using the attached table if it can help). Thank you in advance. Rational of the interventions: some suggestions/questions from our side. * "Medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds?” If I’m not wrong, Choice will deliver the classes in each country of WP4. For each national public agency I would foreseen a budget (other costs) for a “service” - an company that will reimburse the students but also support the organization of the event including translation service (if any), practical organization of the training, sum up of the results, etc. Then, if we got the project, each NPH could decide how to organize the activities nationally. * "How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school?” It will be used to monitor the behavioural dimensions and probably we could consider it as part of the evaluation activities too. * "Who is going to run the mental health counselling website?” The starting point is the Slovenian tool which will be adapted/implemented in other countries. We see the involvement of the Slovenian partner providing the framework/their experience and a main role of the partner implementing the activities at national level (NPH?). NIPH intervention: we read the description of the intervention which is complete and it helps to understand the activities. Arnfinn wrote the follows: "Key stakeholders include the Department of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services (NASKO) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, as well as the school health service coordination offices in the municipalities of Bergen and Trondheim. Resources required: * A NASKO coordinator to oversee and support implementation across the two municipalities – 6 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Bergen municipality – 9 PMs * A school health service coordinator in Trondheim municipality – 9 PMs * Local travel and meeting costs (estimated at EUR 20,000)” I’m not sure about what he meant for “school health service coordination offices”. If he consider those people contractualised by NIPH or by the municipalities. Do you agree if I try to clarify this point with Arnfinn to then decide how to consider the corresponding costs and the role of the municipalities in the consortium? Best regards, Loredana Ukraine intervention: - medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? - How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? o App legata agli interventi (da capire quali interventi sono coinvolti). Se si bisogn o WP di valutazione - Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? Upscale of the tool at project level Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 15:24, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Ukraine also on board. But I think you have already contacted them for the admin information. They are keen to know about the budget. I told them that we can share some information next Tuesday at the earliest. They asked a few questions about the delivery of the interventions that made me think we should consider more carefully some of the cost items involved. For instance, the medical students who will deliver the health literacy classes will need to be paid. In whose budget do we allocate these funds? How are we going to deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school? Who is going to run the mental health counselling website? I will try to come up with a more detailed plan in the next days, but if you have any suggestions, please, let me know. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 02 April 2026 15:14 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you for this update. I included WP4 in the master copy. Loredana Il giorno 2 apr 2026, alle ore 10:12, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, I think the latest version of WP4 is very good. You may include it in the application and I will share it with Daniel now as an example of how his WP should be structured. The call with North Macedonia went well. They will confirm participation next week, after talking to their management (fingers crossed they are not going to pull out as the Germans). They have a preference for the school intervention (younger children), which is not ideal, but we have to accept it. Franco From: Arnfinn Helleve via zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Sent: 31 March 2026 09:17 To: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Dear Loredana Here is (another) updated description of WP4 based on the inputs ion yesterday's meeting Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 13:28 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Thank you Arnfinn. A session of the telco will be dedicated to the task allocation and description so we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the structure with all partners. See you soon. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 30 mar 2026, alle ore 12:26, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana Here is an updated version. I will put the draft WP description into the main document also Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 16:09 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions Perfect. Thank you. Best, Loredana Il giorno 26 mar 2026, alle ore 16:08, Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> ha scritto: Dear Loredana I have will try to get this done as soon as possible Sorry for det delay Best regards Arnfinn ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 12:36 To: Arnfinn Helleve <Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no<mailto:Arnfinn.Helleve@fhi.no>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH, WP4 request for contributions You don't often get email from lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Arnfinn, Have you prepared a draft of WP4 description to be included in the application? In case, please feel free to share it with us. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana Il giorno 20 mar 2026, alle ore 11:30, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Dear Arnfinn, I hope you are all doing well. Following Franco’s email with clarifications on the interventions foreseen in the proposal, I would kindly ask you to complete the attached file with a draft of the WP4 description and brief inputs for Section 1 of the proposal. The file includes some instructions and tips to support the drafting process. I would appreciate receiving your contributions by Wednesday 25th of March, so that we can consolidate all inputs into an updated draft of the proposal. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Loredana <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH.docx> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: Da: "Sassi, Franco" <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Oggetto: [Z-health-consortium] Z-HEALTH, Intervention packages and responsibilities Data: 19 marzo 2026 alle ore 19:33:03 CET A: zhealth-consort <zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>>, IRATI ERREGUERENA REDONDO <irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:irati.erreguerenaredondo@bio-sistemak.eus>>, ANE FULLAONDO ZABALA <ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus<mailto:ane.fullaondozabala@bio-sistemak.eus>> Dear All, Thank you to all those who have been able to participate in the two consortium meetings last week. Both have been extremely helpful in getting to the next step of development of the proposal. Based on the inputs received last week, I have developed two “intervention packages”. You may find descriptions of those packages attached to this message, and in the shared Box folder (sub-folder “Interventions”). In order to help you follow the logic of those intervention packages, please, note the following points: 1. Based on comments received (no age group should be left out within the range provided by the call), I have collapsed the three originally envisaged transitions into two. The first will cover the age range from 12 to 18 and will be labelled transition from early to late adolescence. Intervention package 1 is designed to help this transition by preventing the formation of unhealthy habits, creating and consolidating healthy habits. Intervention package 2 will do the same in the later age group (19-25) supporting the transition to tertiary education/work/independent living. 2. Different domains in each intervention package reflect the structure I proposed on Friday, with several adaptations and specifications. 3. I am circulating these intervention descriptions as proposals (albeit an advanced one, that I would not expect to change to any large extent at this stage). The design of intervention package 1 is ultimately the responsibility of WP4 (led by NIPH) and its partners, and the design of intervention package 2 is the responsibility of WP5 (leadership yet to be assigned – any volunteers or proposals for additional partners who could do it, please, do come forward). 4. The attached intervention descriptions are key tools to be used when approaching country partners whom we expect to implement interventions. WHAT WILL WE THE ASK NEW PARTNERS IN POTENTIALLY IMPLEMENTING COUNTRIES? * What I see as the “ideal” approach here (and I would like to emphasise this is the ideal, but reality may require compromise) is that we include 6 countries implementing interventions in Z-HEALTH, three focusing on the age group 12-18, and three on the age group 19-25. The attached document describing Intervention package 1 currently lists Norway, Slovenia, and possibly Spain (Basque country - TBC) as the three implementing countries. We still need to determine what implementing countries will work on the later age group. * It is not expected that a single organisation (e.g. the Public Health Institute) takes care of implementing the entire package. They can work with other partners (locally or from other countries) on components they need support with. We could even envisage that implementing countries may be given the option of dropping one domain from the intervention package, if they really feel it would be difficult to implement in their countries, but this would not be ideal, because the different domains are meant to address different stages of the habit formation process, as set out in the project’s conceptual framework. * The value of implementing and evaluation a whole package of interventions is that this will enable us to assess synergies between components and across NCD areas. There would be easier options, potentially, involving countries picking and choosing from a menu of singe-domain/single-transition intervention options, but I think this would be inferior to the plan I have described before, and would reduce the value of the project. Apologies that this message is getting long, but I would like to address the issue of responsibilities for individual dimensions in the final part of this email, because we need those responsible to start shaping up the relevant tasks. The dimensions of each intervention package are listed below, along with the individual actions they involve. I have added the names of those I would expect to take responsibility for each of them. Please, look for your names in the list below and assess whether you agree with the proposed allocation and whether you are prepared to work on designing the relevant actions over the coming week (so that we can review those in the next Consortium meeting on 30thMarch). Intervention package 1 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. a. TUTCH health literacy programme. [The CHOICE Foundation (Sweden) are interested in joining the proposal and can work with the European Medical Students’ Association [suggested by Katja, we can follow up with a direct contact and include them too] b. Digital literacy programme. [Marisa Miraldo (Imperial) on mis-information management; volunteers sought in support (Daniel, University of Cologne ? Damon, NYU? Others?)] Domain 2. Self-management of digital media use. [I would see the design of all three components here to be led by NYU, but others are welcome to support if interested] Domain 3. Healthy school environments and nudges. [WHO and EuroHealthNet can oversee this domain, specific contributions may be envisaged from Marisa and Daniel, especially on (a) and (b); others?] Domain 4. Resources and services. [Matey’s team NIJZ, supported by other countries implementing this intervention] Intervention package 2 Domain 1. Health and digital literacy. 1. Health literacy programme. [Possibly Ane, Irati, Biosistemak] 2. Advanced digital literacy programme. [Marisa, NYU team?] Domain 2. Device-assisted behavioural monitoring and feedback. [we need volunteers here] 1. Physical activity 2. Sleep [this could be covered by Matej’s team, but also potentially by NIPH?] 3. Eating patterns and diet [This would have to be Imperial] 4. Probably not suitable Domain 3. Healthy environments and nudges. 1. Food and physical activity environments [Marisa may work on this, but I realise her name is down too many times in this list] 2. Addictive product environments [maybe Daniel, again?] 3. Mental health environment, possibly resurrecting the idea of using the ABC framework. [would EuroHealthNet be interested in covering this?] I look forward to hearing from you. Franco <Z-Health Intervention package 1.docx> <Z-Health Intervention package 2.docx> _______________________________________________ zhealth-consort mailing list -- zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-consort-leave@imperial.ac.uk> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3003.docx> <Z-HEALTH_WP Leaders contributions NIPH WP4 3103.docx>_______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>