folder for partner contributions
Hi, I have created a new folder in Z-HEALTH named "partner text contributions for proposal" in which we should put any contributions we have received and will receive. So far we have not systematically stored them in one place (they are probably somewhere in our Inboxes), which means that we may forget or neglect some. We also need to review those contributions and get back to those who made them if they need improvement. For instance, the contribution that Robert sent on the CHOICE approach seemed a bit vague to me when I received it, but I only looked at his email very quickly. Can we also set up a to-do document, in which we list points that need to be addressed before finalising the application, if they can't be addressed immediately?
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Hi Franco, I’ve already collected all (or at least I hope so) contributions from partners and divided them per type: * CONTRIBUTIONS FROM WP LEADERS (inputs from the WP4-5 and 8 about section 1) * METHODOLOGY with inputs from partners about the general methodology (e.g. TUTCH approach, etc) * INTERVENTIONS with the description of the Norway intervention * BUDGET with all inputs from partners related to financial aspects (there is an issue with NYU but I will explain it in a separate email). As the files contains also sensitive emails I created a folder in the RESTRICTED AREA named “Inputs from partners”. About the next steps, I’ll share something this afternoon. Best, Loredana Il giorno 8 apr 2026, alle ore 09:03, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> ha scritto: Hi, I have created a new folder in Z-HEALTH named “partner text contributions for proposal” in which we should put any contributions we have received and will receive. So far we have not systematically stored them in one place (they are probably somewhere in our Inboxes), which means that we may forget or neglect some. We also need to review those contributions and get back to those who made them if they need improvement. For instance, the contribution that Robert sent on the CHOICE approach seemed a bit vague to me when I received it, but I only looked at his email very quickly. Can we also set up a to-do document, in which we list points that need to be addressed before finalising the application, if they can’t be addressed immediately? _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
OK, thank you. I will respond to Jeroen early pm. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Sent: 08 April 2026 12:57 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [Z-health-Mgmt] folder for partner contributions Hi Franco, I’ve already collected all (or at least I hope so) contributions from partners and divided them per type: * CONTRIBUTIONS FROM WP LEADERS (inputs from the WP4-5 and 8 about section 1) * METHODOLOGY with inputs from partners about the general methodology (e.g. TUTCH approach, etc) * INTERVENTIONS with the description of the Norway intervention * BUDGET with all inputs from partners related to financial aspects (there is an issue with NYU but I will explain it in a separate email). As the files contains also sensitive emails I created a folder in the RESTRICTED AREA named “Inputs from partners”. About the next steps, I’ll share something this afternoon. Best, Loredana Il giorno 8 apr 2026, alle ore 09:03, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi, I have created a new folder in Z-HEALTH named “partner text contributions for proposal” in which we should put any contributions we have received and will receive. So far we have not systematically stored them in one place (they are probably somewhere in our Inboxes), which means that we may forget or neglect some. We also need to review those contributions and get back to those who made them if they need improvement. For instance, the contribution that Robert sent on the CHOICE approach seemed a bit vague to me when I received it, but I only looked at his email very quickly. Can we also set up a to-do document, in which we list points that need to be addressed before finalising the application, if they can’t be addressed immediately? _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Hi Franco, Attached a detailed todo list (available in box too under adm issues) divided in two main parts: * tasks on the portal (@Jack most of the red cels are for you ;) * part B file. The most urgent issues in my opinion are the follows: List of participants. To clarify the involvement of the partners in stand by (EMSA, YHO, PRESS and BGF) as it will have a great impact on all the application/budget. Budget. * To define the budget to allocate to the PHIs to * paying the medical students who will deliver the health literacy programme; * deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school; * to run the mental health website and providing counseling (you proposed to ask to Matej); * To check the PMs allocated to each partner and share a version of the budget before the end of this week WP descriptions. * WP3 is missing * WP6 and co-creation approach I sent a reminder to NIJZ Based on what we have to date, I’ll work GANTT chart and tables from 3.1a to g. At a certain point, I would remove the Part B from box and circulate the latest version via email among partners asking specific contributions but up to you to decide. Best, Loredana Il giorno 8 apr 2026, alle ore 12:56, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> ha scritto: Hi Franco, I’ve already collected all (or at least I hope so) contributions from partners and divided them per type: * CONTRIBUTIONS FROM WP LEADERS (inputs from the WP4-5 and 8 about section 1) * METHODOLOGY with inputs from partners about the general methodology (e.g. TUTCH approach, etc) * INTERVENTIONS with the description of the Norway intervention * BUDGET with all inputs from partners related to financial aspects (there is an issue with NYU but I will explain it in a separate email). As the files contains also sensitive emails I created a folder in the RESTRICTED AREA named “Inputs from partners”. About the next steps, I’ll share something this afternoon. Best, Loredana Il giorno 8 apr 2026, alle ore 09:03, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> ha scritto: Hi, I have created a new folder in Z-HEALTH named “partner text contributions for proposal” in which we should put any contributions we have received and will receive. So far we have not systematically stored them in one place (they are probably somewhere in our Inboxes), which means that we may forget or neglect some. We also need to review those contributions and get back to those who made them if they need improvement. For instance, the contribution that Robert sent on the CHOICE approach seemed a bit vague to me when I received it, but I only looked at his email very quickly. Can we also set up a to-do document, in which we list points that need to be addressed before finalising the application, if they can’t be addressed immediately? _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
Hi Loredana, Thank you so much for doing this. I have added a few things in the list in Box. As for Part B, I am happy to take responsibility for finalising section 1 (Excellence), and I hope to do this by Friday. It would be good if Jack took overall responsibility for section 2 (Impact) and you took responsibility for section 3 (except Consortium as a whole and capacity, which I am happy to finalise from the current draft). If all of these are reasonably complete by Friday, we can use the remaining time to review and refine them. On the issues you have identified as “most urgent”: 1. Hopefully we will be able to finalise the list of partners before the end of the week. However, we now have a budget estimate for the German partners from Daniel. The three youth organisations (EMSA, YHO and PRESS) should require fairly low budgets, so we should be able to make progress on budget allocations now. What I am still uncertain about, is whether we have properly accounted for all of the costs that we are likely to incur in the delivery of interventions (your second point below). I will work on this tonight. Should we have a management team call to discuss the budget tomorrow, or can this wait until our scheduled call on Friday? 2. I agree we should communicate to partners where we stand. We need to agree when to circulate a version of the budget and a version of the proposal. We also need to identify any further contributions that may be required. I think we could circulate a budget and a draft proposal on Friday, but I would be keen to hear your views too. Franco From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Sent: 08 April 2026 16:57 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: Z-HEALTH todo list Hi Franco, Attached a detailed todo list (available in box too under adm issues) divided in two main parts: * tasks on the portal (@Jack most of the red cels are for you ;) * part B file. The most urgent issues in my opinion are the follows: List of participants. To clarify the involvement of the partners in stand by (EMSA, YHO, PRESS and BGF) as it will have a great impact on all the application/budget. Budget. * To define the budget to allocate to the PHIs to * paying the medical students who will deliver the health literacy programme; * deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school; * to run the mental health website and providing counseling (you proposed to ask to Matej); * To check the PMs allocated to each partner and share a version of the budget before the end of this week WP descriptions. * WP3 is missing * WP6 and co-creation approach I sent a reminder to NIJZ Based on what we have to date, I’ll work GANTT chart and tables from 3.1a to g. At a certain point, I would remove the Part B from box and circulate the latest version via email among partners asking specific contributions but up to you to decide. Best, Loredana Il giorno 8 apr 2026, alle ore 12:56, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Hi Franco, I’ve already collected all (or at least I hope so) contributions from partners and divided them per type: * CONTRIBUTIONS FROM WP LEADERS (inputs from the WP4-5 and 8 about section 1) * METHODOLOGY with inputs from partners about the general methodology (e.g. TUTCH approach, etc) * INTERVENTIONS with the description of the Norway intervention * BUDGET with all inputs from partners related to financial aspects (there is an issue with NYU but I will explain it in a separate email). As the files contains also sensitive emails I created a folder in the RESTRICTED AREA named “Inputs from partners”. About the next steps, I’ll share something this afternoon. Best, Loredana Il giorno 8 apr 2026, alle ore 09:03, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi, I have created a new folder in Z-HEALTH named “partner text contributions for proposal” in which we should put any contributions we have received and will receive. So far we have not systematically stored them in one place (they are probably somewhere in our Inboxes), which means that we may forget or neglect some. We also need to review those contributions and get back to those who made them if they need improvement. For instance, the contribution that Robert sent on the CHOICE approach seemed a bit vague to me when I received it, but I only looked at his email very quickly. Can we also set up a to-do document, in which we list points that need to be addressed before finalising the application, if they can’t be addressed immediately? _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Hi Franco, Below in your email. L Il giorno 8 apr 2026, alle ore 19:09, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, Thank you so much for doing this. I have added a few things in the list in Box. As for Part B, I am happy to take responsibility for finalising section 1 (Excellence), and I hope to do this by Friday. It would be good if Jack took overall responsibility for section 2 (Impact) and you took responsibility for section 3 (except Consortium as a whole and capacity, which I am happy to finalise from the current draft). If all of these are reasonably complete by Friday, we can use the remaining time to review and refine them. OK. Can we agree on the WP durations as in the attached GANTT chart? It would help me to complete the tables. On the issues you have identified as “most urgent”: 1. Hopefully we will be able to finalise the list of partners before the end of the week. However, we now have a budget estimate for the German partners from Daniel. The three youth organisations (EMSA, YHO and PRESS) should require fairly low budgets, so we should be able to make progress on budget allocations now. What I am still uncertain about, is whether we have properly accounted for all of the costs that we are likely to incur in the delivery of interventions (your second point below). I will work on this tonight. Should we have a management team call to discuss the budget tomorrow, or can this wait until our scheduled call on Friday? 1. Fine with me but I’ll have a meeting tomorrow morning (9a.m. CET) with the Ukrainian partner and then another call at 10.30. We can schedule a call at 11.30 CET. I’ve some doubts about NYU budget (attached for your convenience - sent to Giulia on April 2nd) which is extremely high and estimates made by Daniel. 1. I agree we should communicate to partners where we stand. We need to agree when to circulate a version of the budget and a version of the proposal. We also need to identify any further contributions that may be required. I think we could circulate a budget and a draft proposal on Friday, but I would be keen to hear your views too. Yes, I think both budget and proposal should be circulated by Friday to have enough time to accomodate comments/requests. Franco From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 08 April 2026 16:57 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Z-HEALTH todo list Hi Franco, Attached a detailed todo list (available in box too under adm issues) divided in two main parts: * tasks on the portal (@Jack most of the red cels are for you ;) * part B file. The most urgent issues in my opinion are the follows: List of participants. To clarify the involvement of the partners in stand by (EMSA, YHO, PRESS and BGF) as it will have a great impact on all the application/budget. Budget. * To define the budget to allocate to the PHIs to * paying the medical students who will deliver the health literacy programme; * deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school; * to run the mental health website and providing counseling (you proposed to ask to Matej); * To check the PMs allocated to each partner and share a version of the budget before the end of this week WP descriptions. * WP3 is missing * WP6 and co-creation approach I sent a reminder to NIJZ Based on what we have to date, I’ll work GANTT chart and tables from 3.1a to g. At a certain point, I would remove the Part B from box and circulate the latest version via email among partners asking specific contributions but up to you to decide. Best, Loredana Il giorno 8 apr 2026, alle ore 12:56, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Hi Franco, I’ve already collected all (or at least I hope so) contributions from partners and divided them per type: * CONTRIBUTIONS FROM WP LEADERS (inputs from the WP4-5 and 8 about section 1) * METHODOLOGY with inputs from partners about the general methodology (e.g. TUTCH approach, etc) * INTERVENTIONS with the description of the Norway intervention * BUDGET with all inputs from partners related to financial aspects (there is an issue with NYU but I will explain it in a separate email). As the files contains also sensitive emails I created a folder in the RESTRICTED AREA named “Inputs from partners”. About the next steps, I’ll share something this afternoon. Best, Loredana Il giorno 8 apr 2026, alle ore 09:03, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi, I have created a new folder in Z-HEALTH named “partner text contributions for proposal” in which we should put any contributions we have received and will receive. So far we have not systematically stored them in one place (they are probably somewhere in our Inboxes), which means that we may forget or neglect some. We also need to review those contributions and get back to those who made them if they need improvement. For instance, the contribution that Robert sent on the CHOICE approach seemed a bit vague to me when I received it, but I only looked at his email very quickly. Can we also set up a to-do document, in which we list points that need to be addressed before finalising the application, if they can’t be addressed immediately? _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
Thank you, Loredana. 11:30 CET looks good. Let’s talk about the budget because this is urgent and important. There are a number of issues with the NYU budget, which does not quite match what they said in an email Krystle had sent some time ago. First, I am not sure if the figures are in Dollars or Euros. Second, they have budgeted over 5 years, so there is a 20% excess. Third, they have included indirect costs well above the 25% that the EC pays. Fourth, I think their effort will not be constant over the duration of the project. So, we can review tomorrow and get back to them with a request to revise. They did say they would be flexible. From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Sent: 08 April 2026 18:32 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH todo list Hi Franco, Below in your email. L Il giorno 8 apr 2026, alle ore 19:09, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi Loredana, Thank you so much for doing this. I have added a few things in the list in Box. As for Part B, I am happy to take responsibility for finalising section 1 (Excellence), and I hope to do this by Friday. It would be good if Jack took overall responsibility for section 2 (Impact) and you took responsibility for section 3 (except Consortium as a whole and capacity, which I am happy to finalise from the current draft). If all of these are reasonably complete by Friday, we can use the remaining time to review and refine them. OK. Can we agree on the WP durations as in the attached GANTT chart? It would help me to complete the tables. On the issues you have identified as “most urgent”: 1. Hopefully we will be able to finalise the list of partners before the end of the week. However, we now have a budget estimate for the German partners from Daniel. The three youth organisations (EMSA, YHO and PRESS) should require fairly low budgets, so we should be able to make progress on budget allocations now. What I am still uncertain about, is whether we have properly accounted for all of the costs that we are likely to incur in the delivery of interventions (your second point below). I will work on this tonight. Should we have a management team call to discuss the budget tomorrow, or can this wait until our scheduled call on Friday? 1. Fine with me but I’ll have a meeting tomorrow morning (9a.m. CET) with the Ukrainian partner and then another call at 10.30. We can schedule a call at 11.30 CET. I’ve some doubts about NYU budget (attached for your convenience - sent to Giulia on April 2nd) which is extremely high and estimates made by Daniel. 1. I agree we should communicate to partners where we stand. We need to agree when to circulate a version of the budget and a version of the proposal. We also need to identify any further contributions that may be required. I think we could circulate a budget and a draft proposal on Friday, but I would be keen to hear your views too. Yes, I think both budget and proposal should be circulated by Friday to have enough time to accomodate comments/requests. Franco From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> Sent: 08 April 2026 16:57 To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> Cc: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Z-HEALTH todo list Hi Franco, Attached a detailed todo list (available in box too under adm issues) divided in two main parts: * tasks on the portal (@Jack most of the red cels are for you ;) * part B file. The most urgent issues in my opinion are the follows: List of participants. To clarify the involvement of the partners in stand by (EMSA, YHO, PRESS and BGF) as it will have a great impact on all the application/budget. Budget. * To define the budget to allocate to the PHIs to * paying the medical students who will deliver the health literacy programme; * deliver the self-management of digital media component in each school; * to run the mental health website and providing counseling (you proposed to ask to Matej); * To check the PMs allocated to each partner and share a version of the budget before the end of this week WP descriptions. * WP3 is missing * WP6 and co-creation approach I sent a reminder to NIJZ Based on what we have to date, I’ll work GANTT chart and tables from 3.1a to g. At a certain point, I would remove the Part B from box and circulate the latest version via email among partners asking specific contributions but up to you to decide. Best, Loredana Il giorno 8 apr 2026, alle ore 12:56, Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org<mailto:lmarmora@isinnova.org>> ha scritto: Hi Franco, I’ve already collected all (or at least I hope so) contributions from partners and divided them per type: * CONTRIBUTIONS FROM WP LEADERS (inputs from the WP4-5 and 8 about section 1) * METHODOLOGY with inputs from partners about the general methodology (e.g. TUTCH approach, etc) * INTERVENTIONS with the description of the Norway intervention * BUDGET with all inputs from partners related to financial aspects (there is an issue with NYU but I will explain it in a separate email). As the files contains also sensitive emails I created a folder in the RESTRICTED AREA named “Inputs from partners”. About the next steps, I’ll share something this afternoon. Best, Loredana Il giorno 8 apr 2026, alle ore 09:03, Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>> ha scritto: Hi, I have created a new folder in Z-HEALTH named “partner text contributions for proposal” in which we should put any contributions we have received and will receive. So far we have not systematically stored them in one place (they are probably somewhere in our Inboxes), which means that we may forget or neglect some. We also need to review those contributions and get back to those who made them if they need improvement. For instance, the contribution that Robert sent on the CHOICE approach seemed a bit vague to me when I received it, but I only looked at his email very quickly. Can we also set up a to-do document, in which we list points that need to be addressed before finalising the application, if they can’t be addressed immediately? _______________________________________________ zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk>
participants (2)
-
Loredana Marmora
-
Sassi, Franco