Thank you, Loredana. I think this is very good, although I worry it looks a little like all WPs connect to all other WPs and there isn't a flow. Maybe this isn't a major problem, but I have always viewed these diagrams as showing progression over the course of the project in some way. You certainly know better than me though. Jack ________________________________ From: Loredana Marmora <lmarmora@isinnova.org> Sent: 10 March 2026 17:12 To: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Revision of WP structure External email: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email. Hi Franco and Jack, Attached my proposal of WP structure. Of course feel free to disregard it. I didn’t change the name of the WPs but the connections among them based on the following assumptions: * WP9 communication, dissemination & exploitation should be considered as WP1 and WP2 as horizontal activities * The connections between Disease context WP (WP3) and Intervention design WPs (WP4 and WP5) and between Intervention design and Implementation (WP6) should be bidirectional in order to implement feedbacks; * WP7 evaluation will concerns all “scientific” WPs not only the implementation activities. WP7 should contribute to the analysis of the framework and the intervention design since the beginning. The same applies to WP8. Best regards, Loredana