12 Oct
2014
12 Oct
'14
1:13 p.m.
In figure 2, the RHS overhead looks awfully high. It's an order of magnitude worse than that in figure 5. Is this correct? David On 11 October 2014 11:27, Rathgeber, Florian < florian.rathgeber@imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
I'd still be interested in feedback on this!
On 04/10/14 09:12, Florian Rathgeber wrote:
Dear all,
I finished a first draft of the results section for the Firedrake paper. Any feedback gratefully received!
If you don't have access to the repository you can get a PDF from
https://wwwhomes.doc.ic.ac.uk/~fr710/paper.pdf
Cheers, Florian
-- Dr David Ham Departments of Mathematics and Computing Imperial College London http://www.imperial.ac.uk/people/david.ham