In figure 2, the RHS overhead looks awfully high. It's an order of magnitude worse than that in figure 5. Is this correct?

David

On 11 October 2014 11:27, Rathgeber, Florian <florian.rathgeber@imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
I'd still be interested in feedback on this!

On 04/10/14 09:12, Florian Rathgeber wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I finished a first draft of the results section for the Firedrake paper.
> Any feedback gratefully received!
>
> If you don't have access to the repository you can get a PDF from
>
>   https://wwwhomes.doc.ic.ac.uk/~fr710/paper.pdf
>
> Cheers,
> Florian




--
Dr David Ham
Departments of Mathematics and Computing
Imperial College London

http://www.imperial.ac.uk/people/david.ham