External email: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email.
Dear Franco and Jack,
A short update about last actions:
I included in the application a first draft of WP1 for your review. For the moment, I have included the aspects related to ethics within WP1. A specific Ethics WP should not be necessary but I’m double checking this point.
I filled in some risks in the corresponding table. It must be completed with risks related to the scientific aspects.
Early next week my colleague Valentina will contact Eurohealthnet to work on dissemination and communication activities
Best regards
Loredana
Il giorno 4 mar 2026, alle ore 16:04, Lodge, Heather A <h.lodge@imperial.ac.uk> ha scritto:
Dear All
Here are the points agreed and actions noted from the Z-health management meeting today:
Agreed:
WP structure to include: one WP on NCDs, two WPs on interventions: lower secondary school and upper secondary school age; ethics; implementation; evaluation; exploitation & dissemination.
JACARDI has a pilot in the Basque country run by its public health agency with schoolchildren that could provide a model for an intervention
Sweden has an intervention with medical students on lifestyle risk factors that would provide a model for educating next generation of health professionals
Aim is to see what happens when implementing an intervention in differing countries.
Likely to be a combination of elements that create a critical mass for changing behaviour.
Could divide WP by country
Intervention WPs need to be co-created with young people