CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email.

Hi, 

Probably we can contact the partners to get the form signed (I remember that the same happened for STOP) and you can fill in the table using ChatGPT? What do you think?

If you agree, let’s clarify who are not public agencies first. I tried to summarize in the table below (and attached) the list of partners/potential partners. Can you check the distinction I made under Public Agency column and clarify how to consider those highlighted in yellow.

Best, 
Loredana 

Participation   Organisation Short name Country Public Agency
OK 1 IMPERIAL COLLEGE OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICINE ICL UK ?
OK 2 ISTITUTO DI STUDI PER L'INTEGRAZIONE DEI SISTEMI ISINNOVA IT NO
OK 3 NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH  NIPH NO YES
OK 4 EUROHEALTHNET ASBL EHNet BE NO
OK 5 National Institute of Public Health Slovenia NIJZ SI YES
OK 6 University of Cologne  UoC DE ?
OK 7 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY NYU US ?
OK 8 University of Amsterdam AUMC NL ?
Declined 9 PHI   DE  
Confirmed interest 10 Instituto de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud Biosistemak Biosistemak ES YES
Confirmed interest 11 Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Macedonia  IPH MK YES
Confirmed interest 12 State Institution Public Health Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine PHC UA YES
Confirmed interest 13 Choice foundation Choice SE NO
SB 14 European Medical Students’ Association EMSA BE NO
SB 15 International Youth Health Organisation YHO SI NO
SB 16 PRESS PRESS NO NO
SB 17 BGF Institute BGF BE NO

Il giorno 31 mar 2026, alle ore 14:18, Olney, Jack J <jack.olney@imperial.ac.uk> ha scritto:

Thanks, Franco.

Okay - I agree that the information in the spreadsheet should be okay to find, but signatures will require corresponding with each partner. ISINNOVA, how would you like to handle this - could we split the tasks? 

Jack
From: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>
Sent: 31 March 2026 13:06
To: Olney, Jack J <jack.olney@imperial.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: Z-HEALTH WHO
 
This should be submitted next Tuesday with the rest of the documents, ideally.

 

From: Olney, Jack J <jack.olney@imperial.ac.uk>
Sent: 31 March 2026 14:00
To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH WHO

 

Thank you, Franco.

 

I vaguely recall having to do this for STOP. Do WHO require this all to be completed before they will agree to be a partner or can we complete this ahead of the submission date?

 

Jack
From: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>
Sent: 31 March 2026 11:55
To: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>
Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH WHO

 

I have had a call with WHO this morning to discuss their possible involvement in the proposal. They do not actually require a full proposal today, but they have asked for it by next Tuesday. Hopefully we’ll have a more advanced draft and a preliminary budget by then.

 

The most annoying requirement is the due diligence that WHO needs to do on all partners that are not public agencies. This means that we need to collect some information on each of the partners, and we need to get them to sign a “Tobacco and arms disclosure form” (please, see attached email from Julianne). One of the WHO people on the call, who is used to doing this due diligence process, says that much of the information in the spreadsheet can be retrieved through ChatGPT queries. Please, let me know what you think.

 

In terms of monthly rate, they have proposed 9566 Euros, which is a mix of 50% of a P3 official and a full time consultant. This does not buy many person months if we allocate 200k to them, but their contribution would be limited anyway.

 

Franco

 

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
zhealth-mgmt mailing list -- zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk
To unsubscribe send an email to zhealth-mgmt-leave@imperial.ac.uk