Thanks, Franco.

Okay - I agree that the information in the spreadsheet should be okay to find, but signatures will require corresponding with each partner. ISINNOVA, how would you like to handle this - could we split the tasks? 

Jack
From: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>
Sent: 31 March 2026 13:06
To: Olney, Jack J <jack.olney@imperial.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: Z-HEALTH WHO
 

This should be submitted next Tuesday with the rest of the documents, ideally.

 

From: Olney, Jack J <jack.olney@imperial.ac.uk>
Sent: 31 March 2026 14:00
To: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Z-HEALTH WHO

 

Thank you, Franco.

 

I vaguely recall having to do this for STOP. Do WHO require this all to be completed before they will agree to be a partner or can we complete this ahead of the submission date?

 

Jack

From: Sassi, Franco <f.sassi@imperial.ac.uk>
Sent: 31 March 2026 11:55
To: zhealth-mgmt <zhealth-mgmt@imperial.ac.uk>
Subject: [Z-health-Mgmt] Z-HEALTH WHO

 

I have had a call with WHO this morning to discuss their possible involvement in the proposal. They do not actually require a full proposal today, but they have asked for it by next Tuesday. Hopefully we’ll have a more advanced draft and a preliminary budget by then.

 

The most annoying requirement is the due diligence that WHO needs to do on all partners that are not public agencies. This means that we need to collect some information on each of the partners, and we need to get them to sign a “Tobacco and arms disclosure form” (please, see attached email from Julianne). One of the WHO people on the call, who is used to doing this due diligence process, says that much of the information in the spreadsheet can be retrieved through ChatGPT queries. Please, let me know what you think.

 

In terms of monthly rate, they have proposed 9566 Euros, which is a mix of 50% of a P3 official and a full time consultant. This does not buy many person months if we allocate 200k to them, but their contribution would be limited anyway.

 

Franco