Dear Jeroen,
Thank you for your prompt reply, and apologies for the duplication of messages (my fault). I am very pleased you are interested, in principle. I appreciate
your transparency in declaring your possible involvement in another bid. Normally, we would expect partners to be engaged exclusively in one bid, but I do realise that we are asking you at a very late stage, when other commitments may have been made, so I
will leave it to you to judge how to handle the potential conflict. We have been working together for long enough to trust each other, I think.
I am leading a proposal for this call, in collaboration with a number of National Public Health Institutes and Universities, as well as youth organisations.
The proposal builds in part of the two large European Joint actions PreventNCD and JACARDI, as well as on previous Horizon projects that members of the consortium have coordinated.
We are working on three health areas that are strongly associated with young people's behaviours in the age range on which the call is focused (12-25).
These are obesity and metabolic health; mental health; and addictions (broadly
covering, alcohol, tobacco, substance use, gambling, screen addictions etc.). We have identified two key transitions within the relevant age range. The transition from early to late adolescence (age 12-18, coinciding with secondary school years) and the transition
from secondary school to tertiary education/work/independent living (age 19-25). For each of these two age subgroups, we have created intervention packages that include multiple components, as follows:
1. For
the age group 12-18 (current plan is to implement this in Norway, Slovenia and Spain):
-
Health and digital literacy
-
Self-management of digital media use
-
Health promoting environments and nudges
-
Resources and services
2. For
the age group 19-25 (current plan is to implement this in Germany, North Macedonia and Ukraine):
-
Health and digital literacy
-
Device-assisted monitoring and feedback
-
Health promoting environments and nudges
The structure of the project if reflected in the attached simplified work package diagram. I would like to draw your attention, in particular, to WP3,
which is designed to establish the focus of the project within three key health areas, identified as: obesity and metabolic health; mental health; and addictions (broadly covering, alcohol, tobacco, substance use, gambling, screen addictions etc.). WP3 will
assess the behavioural underpinnings of those conditions, and how they have evolved over time, with a view to strengthening intervention frameworks and informing the design of interventions that will be implemented as part of the project. WP3 will examine
trends over time in the incidence of conditions in those three areas in young people, and changes in risk exposures that have been driving those trends.
If you (and other relevant colleagues from your University) were willing to take on the leadership of WP3, we believe this would strengthen the proposal.
We have other academic partners who can cover the individual health areas I mentioned above, such as Imperial for obesity, NYU for addictions, and NIJZ (Slovenian National Public Health Institute) for mental health. So, you would be well supported.
Please, let me know what you think, and we can discuss more in detail the contents of that work package.
Franco
|
CAUTION: This message came from outside Imperial.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and were expecting this email.
|
Thanks for your kind invitation. I would be happy to join. Jack (in CC) also send an email along the same lines yesterday evening, and here is what I responded:
Good to hear from you. And many thanks for reaching out regarding the call. I am keen to hear more.
To be fully transparent, I am *probably* part of another proposal for that same call. But they started late and did not yet formally include me. Our role there would be
to provide some environmental exposure input for an app so that it can prompt context-specific messages to users.
Participation in one proposal does not restrict partners to also participate in another; and I can be fully committed. But if this would be problematic for you and if
my role would be substantial, I can retract from that other proposal.
So, happy to hear more and perhaps discuss it in a short call?
Dr. Jeroen Lakerveld
Associate professor
Vice-director, Amsterdam Public Health research institute
Department of Epidemiology & Data Science
Location VUmc | Medical Faculty Building
van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Dear Jeroen,
I do apologise for this last minute request. We are working on a grant application in the current call on Behavioural interventions for NCD prevention in young people (
EU
Funding & Tenders Portal). The proposal is well advanced, but for various reasons we have an important gap that we need to fill, and I believe you would be a very appropriate partner to do that. The work would tie in very nicely with aspects of OBCT. It
is a crowded call, so I would like, first of all, to ask if you are already involved in other bids. If not, my next question is whether you would be interested, in principle, in joining a proposal at this late stage (the deadline is 16/4). Of course, we would
limit our demands on your time and would minimise the inputs required. Based on your answers to the above questions, I will be happy to share more details about the proposal and your potential role.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Franco
Franco Sassi PhD
Chair in International Health Policy and Economics
Director, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Innovation (CHEPI)
Imperial Business School
London SW7 2AZ
United Kingdom