Dear Community Leaders, I hope that most of you are aware that we have a computing committee in physics that discuss all aspects of computing and how they relate to the Department. These include all aspects of research, teaching, infrastructure etc etc. We are in the process of drawing up ToRs - this committee has existed longer than I have been in college and any existing ToR are long lost to history (and were probably written on punch cards). As part of this we discussed how the new communities should be represented on this committee. In the past we had at least one representative from each research group. I say "at least one" as it is more important to have the right people than to be exclusive. Our initial suggestion was that there should be at least two from each community. Given that the communities have just formed you may not be aware of the members from your community. The current reps are: Light: Mark Neil, Kyle Major Matter: Jenny Nelson, Andy Thomas Particles: David Colling, Dan Whitehouse, Simon Fayer, Ray Beuselink Universe: Andrew Jaffe, Tim Evans Space, plasma, climate: Rich Bantges, Stuart Mangles We also have Ruth Mclauchlan who is the link between the accelerator beams and medicine. There are others with different roles (such as those teaching computing intensive courses etc). Some people are more active than others but overall the group works pretty well. So my questions to you as Community Leaders are: - Do you think that a minimum of two per community is reasonable? - Are you happy with the reps from your community (e.g. would you like to add somebody with particular expertise)? - Any other feedback that you would wish to give? Best, david