Hi David and Carl,

well, this is what Jony Hudson from CCM has to say about that:

----
On the other hand, cutting off Mathematica would have a very serious 
impact on CCM's operations. At the moment it is used by almost all 
members of the group. I've searched a number of times, most recently 
about a month back, for a comparable alternative and have been unable to 
find one. That said, it would not be impossible to make do without it, 
using a variety of other tools (Matlab, Maple and Scientific Word for 
instance). But there'd be a very serious productivity hit in the short 
term, and on technical grounds I'd say that these other tools are not as 
good, so this wouldn't be a viable long term solution either.

I don't know what the right thing to do is. I guess making it clear now 
to Wolfram that we won't renew in September might be a good idea. Then 
at least there's a chance that we'll get what we want before it comes to 
the crunch.

But if it does come to the crunch then I'd say the bottom line - given 
that we need to get science done first and foremost - is that CCM 
wouldn't be willing to refuse to use Mathematica.
----

Regards,
Stefan


Dr Stefan Scheel
Reader in Quantum Optics
Blackett Laboratory
Imperial College London
Prince Consort Road
London SW7 2AZ
United Kingdom

phone: +44(0)20 7594 7720

On 13/04/11 14:53, Paterson, Carl wrote:
Not many people use it in PHOT. I've just sent out a request asking the
views of any that do.

Stefan, angry enough to stump up £30,000pa X 8years   = £240,000 ?

Carl



On 13/04/11 14:31, Stefan Scheel wrote:
  
David,

Mathematica is absolutely essential for parts of QOLS, particularly the
Centre for Cold Matter.
They would get very angry, indeed, if anyone would try to stop them
using it.

Stefan

Dr Stefan Scheel
Reader in Quantum Optics
Blackett Laboratory
Imperial College London
Prince Consort Road
London SW7 2AZ
United Kingdom

phone: +44(0)20 7594 7720


On 13/04/11 13:29, David Colling wrote:
    
Dear Computing Reps,

The Wolfram lawyers are being wholly unreasonable and so Jo asked me if 
we could possibly do without any Wolfram products in the department. I 
replied that whilst this would be fine for me (I have access via CERN) I 
suspect that many would not be able to work effectively without it. I 
did however, say that I would ask this group in case I was wrong. So, 
was I wrong?

All the best,
david

_______________________________________________
Physics-Departmental-Computing mailing list
Physics-Departmental-Computing@imperial.ac.uk
https://mailman.ic.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/physics-departmental-computing