FieldConvert output fields on GLL points
Dear all, Is there some easy way in FieldConvert to write a vtu file with all fields computed on the GLL points instead of on equispaced element sub-meshes? For wall-y+ calculation it is the first GLL point away from the surface that should be checked, rather than the element height, which I think is given. Or when assessing if near-wall gradients are well resolved, it would be better to have fields plotted on a mesh that is representative of the modal resolution used. Thanks.
HI, For a .dat output the option “- - noequispaced” will stop dumping at equispaced points but will put it at quadrature points. I do not however know if this will work with vtu files. Cheers Spencer PS Checking at GLL points can be misleading since these points are only relevant when performing a collocation projection. On 6 Dec 2016, at 17:48, F Mellibovsky <fernando.mellibovsky@upc.edu<mailto:fernando.mellibovsky@upc.edu>> wrote: Dear all, Is there some easy way in FieldConvert to write a vtu file with all fields computed on the GLL points instead of on equispaced element sub-meshes? For wall-y+ calculation it is the first GLL point away from the surface that should be checked, rather than the element height, which I think is given. Or when assessing if near-wall gradients are well resolved, it would be better to have fields plotted on a mesh that is representative of the modal resolution used. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Nektar-users mailing list Nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:Nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk> https://mailman.ic.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/nektar-users Spencer Sherwin McLaren Racing/Royal Academy of Engineering Research Chair, Professor of Computational Fluid Mechanics, Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London South Kensington Campus London SW7 2AZ s.sherwin@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:s.sherwin@imperial.ac.uk> +44 (0) 20 759 45052
participants (2)
- 
                
                F Mellibovsky
- 
                
                Sherwin, Spencer J