******************* This email originates from outside Imperial. Do not click on links and attachments unless you recognise the sender. If you trust the sender, add them to your safe senders list https://spam.ic.ac.uk/SpamConsole/Senders.aspx to disable email stamping for this address. ******************* Dear all, Does Nektar++ have a threshold regarding the number of elements in the mesh (in particular in the 3D case)? Is there a maximum value below which I should work? Thank you. Kind regards, Silvia
Dear Silvia, As far as I know there is no hard limit per se. Some functions might start giving overflow issues if you reach a problem size in the order of 2^31 degrees of freedom per variable given that some indexes use `int` variables. If this ends up being a concrete issue, we can look into homogenizing all indexes to use `size_t` and move the theoretical limit to 2^64 dof. Cheers, Giacomo On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 6:59 PM Silvia Ceccacci (HDR) < silvia.ceccacci@hdr.mq.edu.au> wrote:
This email from silvia.ceccacci@hdr.mq.edu.au originates from outside Imperial. Do not click on links and attachments unless you recognise the sender. If you trust the sender, add them to your safe senders list <https://spam.ic.ac.uk/SpamConsole/Senders.aspx> to disable email stamping for this address.
Dear all,
Does Nektar++ have a threshold regarding the number of elements in the mesh (in particular in the 3D case)? Is there a maximum value below which I should work?
Thank you.
Kind regards, Silvia
_______________________________________________ Nektar-users mailing list Nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk https://mailman.ic.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/nektar-users
participants (2)
- 
                
                Giacomo Castiglioni
- 
                
                Silvia Ceccacci (HDR)