10e5 Re 2D flow over NACA airfoil
Hi all, I'm trying to compare the results obtained for flow over a NACA 0018 airfoil for both traditional FVM solvers (in my case OpenFOAM) and an hp solver like nektar++. I was wondering what the most appropriate case from the test directory that I could modify for my use vis-a-vis solver properties would be? I have already obtained the mesh from gmsh and used MeshConvert to obtain the appropriate .xml file. Do the physical lines as defined on the original .geo file map in the same manner as composites to the .xml file? i.e. Would Physical Line 1 from gmsh Translate to Composite 1 in the .xml file the MeshConvert outputs? Sincerely, *Amitvikram Dutta* *MASc Candidate* *Graduate Research Assistant * *Okanagan CFD Laboratory* *University of British Columbia | Okanagan Campus*
Hello, just to be sure what type of simulation are you looking after? LES or RANS or something else? Cheers, Rodrigo .
Hi Mike, Thanks, for the confirmation. I have a pair of periodic boundaries and wanted to know if I was setting up the simulation correctly. Rodrigo, Its a DNS. Cheers On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:45 AM Rodrigo Moura <r.moura13@imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
Hello, just to be sure what type of simulation are you looking after? LES or RANS or something else?
Cheers, Rodrigo .
participants (2)
-
Amitvikram Dutta
-
Rodrigo Moura