Hi Abhishek, Are you doing the 2D channel, or the 2.5D case? Could it be that the size of the problem is such that using 8 cores results in very little problem per core - so kind of does not help? Also, when in parallel you can not use the Arpack driver, only the ModifiedArnoldi will work. Finally, in my experience, using: <I PROPERTY="SolverType" VALUE="VelocityCorrectionScheme"/> works better in parallel than: <I PROPERTY="SolverType" VALUE="CoupledLinearisedNS"/> Hope this helps in some way, Best, Stan On 10/23/2018 05:56 PM, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to test the linear stability solver in parallel. I did a simple test with the channel flow with a single processor and on 8 processors. I observed the following:
Time taken per 1000 steps for single processor = 2.76512s Time taken per 1000 steps for 8 processors = 24.7811s
I expected a reduction in the computational time while running parallel. Is there any issue in the parallel implementation of the linear stability solver? Is something related with the eigenvalue solver?
I would be highly thankful for the comments on this issue.
With regards Abhishek Kumar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Abhishek Kumar Research Associate Applied Mathematics Research Centre Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB The United Kingdom
Email # ac7600@coventry.ac.uk <mailto:ac7600@coventry.ac.uk>, abhishek.kir@gmail.com <mailto:abhishek.kir@gmail.com> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Nektar-users mailing list Nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk https://mailman.ic.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/nektar-users