Dear Ding,
In what way does your measurement differ from the literature. Is the difference substantial? Could you provide a plot of the output showing the differences?
One challenge in this problem is the inconsistent boundary conditions at the ends of the top wall. The values used at the top left and top right corners depends on the order of the boundary conditions. You could therefore swap the order of the boundary regions/conditions in the XML file and see if that improves your solution?
Cheers,
Chris
On 22/08/16 06:15, 丁老师 wrote:
______________________________Dear Nektar group:
I am conducting numerical simulation for 2D lid driven cavity
problem with Re=1000. Attachment please find my xml file.
But i found the output results at monitor point is different from
benchmark solution from open literature. I have changed the order from
20 to 40, the nothing changed.
but the stream line pattern is the same with benchmark solution.
what should i do further>
Regards
Your Sincerely
Ding
_________________
Nektar-users mailing list
Nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk
https://mailman.ic.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/nektar-users
--
Chris Cantwell
Imperial College London
South Kensington Campus
London SW7 2AZ
Email: c.cantwell@imperial.ac.uk
www.imperial.ac.uk/people/c.cantwell
_______________________________________________
Nektar-users mailing list
Nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk
https://mailman.ic.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/nektar-users