From: nektar-users-bounces@imperial.ac.uk <nektar-users-bounces@imperial.ac.uk> on behalf of Sherwin, Spencer J <s.sherwin@imperial.ac.uk>
Sent: 21 February 2022 19:15
To: Shukla, Khemraj <khemraj_shukla@brown.edu>
Cc: nektar-users <nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [Nektar-users] 2D mesh generation

Hi Alessandro,

We have just posted a blog on converting from point wise to our format. Actually in this case we just use the gmsh output format. So this might be a possibility from other converters too.

Cheers,

Spencer.

On 21 Feb 2022, at 01:53, Shukla, Khemraj <khemraj_shukla@brown.edu> wrote:

Hi Alessandro-

You may want to look into Sandia National Lab's CUBIT package https://cubit.sandia.gov/tutorials/

That might be relatively easier to use than GMSH.

Best,

Raj

On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 8:57 AM Alessandro Alberto de Lima <aalima@usp.br> wrote:

This email from aalima@usp.br originates from outside Imperial. Do not click on links and attachments unless you recognise the sender. If you trust the sender, add them to your safe senders list to disable email stamping for this address.

Hi Guys.

At the moment, I have generated my quadrilateral meshes with gmesh.

Are there other options? Is it possible to convert the quadrilateral meshes generated by ICEM CFD for example?

I am trying to better control the quadrilateral mesh generation.

Gmesh is starting to turn into an annoying experience.

Thank you very much.

Alessandro

_______________________________________________
Nektar-users mailing list
Nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk
https://mailman.ic.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/nektar-users

_______________________________________________
Nektar-users mailing list
Nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk
https://mailman.ic.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/nektar-users