|
This email from weiyh.he@gmail.com originates from outside Imperial. Do not click on links and attachments unless you recognise the sender. If you trust the sender, add them to your safe senders list to disable email stamping for this address. |
<FUNCTION NAME="SelectEVCalcDomain0"> <E VAR="C0" VALUE="-5" /> <E VAR="C1" VALUE="10." /> <E VAR="C2" VALUE=" -5" /> <E VAR="C3" VALUE="10" /> </FUNCTION>
When I used ModifiedArnoldi scheme, the running gives CFL=0 and crashed. When I switched to Arpack option, the calculation ran but the setup kept dumping out zero eigenvalue. Is there any approach that could help improve the simulation? thanks!
regards,
Wei
_______________________________________________Hi Xiangjun,
You can use a smooth initial disturbance to avoid eigenvalue of 1. If BaseFlow_interporder is not zero, the code uses a Lagrange interpolation
and it can be used for non-periodic baseflow. Additionally, you can select a near body domain to compute the eigenvalue, seting the option SelectEVCalcDomain0,
since the far-field grids are usually coarse and contains large numerical errors.
We have tested this feature in our previous paper, see appendix
Gao A K, Cantwell C D, Son O, et al. Three-dimensional transition and force characteristics of low-Reynolds-number flows past a plunging airfoil[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2023, 973: A43.
Best Regards
Ankang Gao
Research AssociateDepartment of modern mechanicsUniversity of Science and Technology of China
Nektar-users mailing list
Nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk
https://mailman.ic.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/nektar-users