Hi Fabian,

Sorry we seem to be behind on responding to your emails. 

We are developing software to use our own generator NekMesh but we are really just in the testing phase. We hope to release this along side the  release of4.4 which is currently due to be released around Feb 23rd. We also have a tutorial so that will provide some idea of what we can do. 

Regarding the APE-Simulations Killian is best placed to comment on this. 

Cheers,
Spencer.



On 7 Feb 2017, at 12:13, Selbach, Fabian <fabian.selbach@student.uni-siegen.de> wrote:

Dear users,

can somebody send me an example of an APE-Simulation by a source from file of another simulation? Is it actually possible to do something like that in Nektar++?

To take the base flow from a simulation is easy, but to get the acoustical source term is quit difficult and actually not possible, I think. Am I right?

Best regards

Fabian
Von: Selbach, Fabian
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Januar 2017 16:14
An: nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk
Betreff: Source terms and mesh generation

Dear Users,

which kind of mesh generator do you recommend to get a good mesh for an airfoil simulation? Actually I am using Gmsh.

My next question deals with the CompressibleFlowSolver in Nektar++. Is there a possibility to get acoustical source terms during a simulation with its?

Best regards

Fabian
_______________________________________________
Nektar-users mailing list
Nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk
https://mailman.ic.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/nektar-users

Spencer  Sherwin
McLaren Racing/Royal Academy of Engineering Research Chair, 
Professor of Computational Fluid Mechanics,
Department of Aeronautics,
Imperial College London
South Kensington Campus
London SW7 2AZ

+44 (0) 20 759 45052