Sure!


On Wed, Jul 6, 2016, 12:55 PM David Moxey <d.moxey@imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi Gian,

In fact it seems I have a branch sat in my repository that fixes this but I apparently forgot to submit a merge request..!

I'll tidy it up and submit a request shortly, and then perhaps Amitvikram and Fabian, you can test this for us?

Cheers,

Dave

> On 6 Jul 2016, at 20:51, Mengaldo, Gianmarco <g.mengaldo11@imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Yep, indeed, this is the case!
> We should finally patch it out! ;)
>
>
> Cheers,
> Gian
>
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung device
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: David Moxey <d.moxey@imperial.ac.uk>
> Date: 06/07/2016 20:32 (GMT+00:00)
> To: "Mengaldo, Gianmarco" <g.mengaldo11@imperial.ac.uk>
> Cc: Amitvikram Dutta <amitvdutta23@gmail.com>, "Moura, Rodrigo C" <r.moura13@imperial.ac.uk>, "Selbach, Fabian" <fabian.selbach@student.uni-siegen.de>, nektar-users <nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Nektar-users] Problem 3D CompressibleFlowSolver
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am guessing this is down to us using ExtractTracePhys() inside the boundary condition functions? I thought this had been patched out but it seems not.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
> > On 6 Jul 2016, at 20:25, Mengaldo, Gianmarco <g.mengaldo11@imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Yes, this is a known issue that we are trying to fix permanently!
> >
> > We have a temporary fix for it at the moment. Rodrigo should be able to help.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gianmarco
> >
> >
> > Sent from my Samsung device
> >
> >
> > -------- Original message --------
> > From: Amitvikram Dutta <amitvdutta23@gmail.com>
> > Date: 06/07/2016 19:22 (GMT+00:00)
> > To: "Moura, Rodrigo C" <r.moura13@imperial.ac.uk>, "Selbach, Fabian" <fabian.selbach@student.uni-siegen.de>
> > Cc: nektar-users <nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk>
> > Subject: Re: [Nektar-users] Problem 3D CompressibleFlowSolver
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been having an identical problem and would appreciate knowledge of the bypass
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016, 11:20 AM Rodrigo Moura <r.moura13@imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
> > Hello Fabian,
> >
> > This might be an issue related to parallelization due to some recent modifications in the master or release branches. Does your case run in serial? If it runs, I can show you how to bypass this problem and run in parallel before an official fix is done.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rodrigo
> > .
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nektar-users mailing list
> > Nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk
> > https://mailman.ic.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/nektar-users
> > --
> > Amitvikram Dutta
> > MASc Candidate
> > Graduate Research Assistant
> > Okanagan CFD Laboratory
> > University of British Columbia | Okanagan Campus
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nektar-users mailing list
> > Nektar-users@imperial.ac.uk
> > https://mailman.ic.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/nektar-users
>
>
>
> --
> David Moxey (Research and Teaching Fellow)
> d.moxey@imperial.ac.uk | www.imperial.ac.uk/people/d.moxey
>
> Room 364, Department of Aeronautics,
> Imperial College London,
> London, SW7 2AZ, UK.

--
David Moxey (Research and Teaching Fellow)
d.moxey@imperial.ac.uk | www.imperial.ac.uk/people/d.moxey

Room 364, Department of Aeronautics,
Imperial College London,
London, SW7 2AZ, UK.

--

Amitvikram Dutta

MASc Candidate

Graduate Research Assistant 

Okanagan CFD Laboratory

University of British Columbia | Okanagan Campus