Hi Henrik, That sounds like a bug. Can you create a minimal failing example and file a github issue please? Regards, David On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 at 10:48 Buesing, Henrik <HBuesing@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
Dear all,
If I include
*from firedrake*_*adjoint import **
in my firedrake program, my forward problem does not converge any more. If I do nothing else than loading firedrake_adjoint, should the forward problem not run as before? Note, that I set all the solver options from the command line and not in the program itself. Thus, in the program I just have
*solver = NonlinearVariationalSolver(problem,options_prefix="") * Thank you! Henrik
--
Dipl.-Math. Henrik Büsing
Institute for Applied Geophysics and Geothermal Energy
E.ON Energy Research Center
RWTH Aachen University
------------------------------------------------------
Mathieustr. 10 | Tel +49 (0)241 80 49907 <+49%20241%208049907>
52074 Aachen, Germany | Fax +49 (0)241 80 49889 <+49%20241%208049889>
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.eonerc.rwth-aachen.de/GGE
hbuesing@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de
------------------------------------------------------
-- Dr David Ham Department of Mathematics Imperial College London
Yes! I opened a github issue here<https://github.com/firedrakeproject/firedrake/issues/1042>. I guess the markdown messes with the python code. Sorry, for that. Henrik -- Dipl.-Math. Henrik Büsing Institute for Applied Geophysics and Geothermal Energy E.ON Energy Research Center RWTH Aachen University Mathieustr. | Tel +49 (0)241 80 49907 52074 Aachen, Germany | Fax +49 (0)241 80 49889 http://www.eonerc.rwth-aachen.de/GGE hbuesing@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de Von: firedrake-bounces@imperial.ac.uk [mailto:firedrake-bounces@imperial.ac.uk] Im Auftrag von David Ham Gesendet: Montag, 10. April 2017 11:57 An: firedrake <firedrake@imperial.ac.uk> Betreff: Re: [firedrake] firedrake_adjoint Hi Henrik, That sounds like a bug. Can you create a minimal failing example and file a github issue please? Regards, David On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 at 10:48 Buesing, Henrik <HBuesing@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de<mailto:HBuesing@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de>> wrote: Dear all, If I include from firedrake_adjoint import * in my firedrake program, my forward problem does not converge any more. If I do nothing else than loading firedrake_adjoint, should the forward problem not run as before? Note, that I set all the solver options from the command line and not in the program itself. Thus, in the program I just have solver = NonlinearVariationalSolver(problem,options_prefix="") Thank you! Henrik -- Dipl.-Math. Henrik Büsing Institute for Applied Geophysics and Geothermal Energy E.ON Energy Research Center RWTH Aachen University ------------------------------------------------------ Mathieustr. 10 | Tel +49 (0)241 80 49907<tel:+49%20241%208049907> 52074 Aachen, Germany | Fax +49 (0)241 80 49889<tel:+49%20241%208049889> ------------------------------------------------------ http://www.eonerc.rwth-aachen.de/GGE hbuesing@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de<mailto:hbuesing@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de> ------------------------------------------------------ -- Dr David Ham Department of Mathematics Imperial College London
Dear colleagues, sorry for hijacking the thread, but could you explain to me, how to compute residue of adjoint functional, if possible, with firedrake-adjoint? I've seen in the documentation that |J = Functional(inner(u, u)*dx*dt[FINISH_TIME]) for (variable, solution) in compute_adjoint(J): | provides the solution of adjoint problem, but for residual I need not only solution, but also a set of adjoint equations. Sincerely, George On 10.04.2017 17:32, Buesing, Henrik wrote:
Yes! I opened a github issue here <https://github.com/firedrakeproject/firedrake/issues/1042>. I guess the markdown messes with the python code. Sorry, for that.
Henrik
--
Dipl.-Math. Henrik Büsing
Institute for Applied Geophysics and Geothermal Energy
E.ON Energy Research Center
RWTH Aachen University
Mathieustr. | Tel +49 (0)241 80 49907
52074 Aachen, Germany | Fax +49 (0)241 80 49889
http://www.eonerc.rwth-aachen.de/GGE
hbuesing@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de
*Von:*firedrake-bounces@imperial.ac.uk [mailto:firedrake-bounces@imperial.ac.uk] *Im Auftrag von *David Ham *Gesendet:* Montag, 10. April 2017 11:57 *An:* firedrake <firedrake@imperial.ac.uk> *Betreff:* Re: [firedrake] firedrake_adjoint
Hi Henrik,
That sounds like a bug. Can you create a minimal failing example and file a github issue please?
Regards,
David
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 at 10:48 Buesing, Henrik <HBuesing@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de <mailto:HBuesing@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de>> wrote:
Dear all,
If I include
/from firedrake/_/adjoint import */
in my firedrake program, my forward problem does not converge any more. If I do nothing else than loading firedrake_adjoint, should the forward problem not run as before? Note, that I set all the solver options from the command line and not in the program itself. Thus, in the program I just have
/solver = NonlinearVariationalSolver(problem,options_prefix="")// / Thank you! Henrik
--
Dipl.-Math. Henrik Büsing
Institute for Applied Geophysics and Geothermal Energy
E.ON Energy Research Center
RWTH Aachen University
------------------------------------------------------
Mathieustr. 10 | Tel +49 (0)241 80 49907 <tel:+49%20241%208049907>
52074 Aachen, Germany | Fax +49 (0)241 80 49889 <tel:+49%20241%208049889>
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.eonerc.rwth-aachen.de/GGE
hbuesing@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de <mailto:hbuesing@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de>
------------------------------------------------------
--
Dr David Ham
Department of Mathematics
Imperial College London
_______________________________________________ firedrake mailing list firedrake@imperial.ac.uk https://mailman.ic.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/firedrake
participants (3)
-
Buesing, Henrik
-
David Ham
-
George Ovchinnikov