Yes. Those are equivalent. You should be able to work out which of your results is correct by just integrating the unit function along the line and observing which solution approximates pi*d From: <firedrake-bounces@imperial.ac.uk> on behalf of "Floriane Gidel [RPG]" <mmfg@leeds.ac.uk> Reply-To: firedrake <firedrake@imperial.ac.uk> Date: Wednesday, 10 October 2018 at 15:39 To: firedrake <firedrake@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [firedrake] local discontinuity Dear all, Concerning the integral on the interface between the disk and the plane, is it not equivalent to write *4*avg(I_d)*avg(I_c)*dS and *dS(interface_id) where interface_id is the id of the interface ? I don't get the same results when using one or the other. Thank you, Floriane ________________________________ De : firedrake-bounces@imperial.ac.uk <firedrake-bounces@imperial.ac.uk> de la part de Ham, David A <david.ham@imperial.ac.uk> Envoyé : lundi 8 octobre 2018 14:48 À : firedrake Objet : Re: [firedrake] local discontinuity Note also that using avg in a dx integral doesn’t make much sense (thought it doesn’t actually change the answer) From: <firedrake-bounces@imperial.ac.uk> on behalf of "Floriane Gidel [RPG]" <mmfg@leeds.ac.uk> Reply-To: firedrake <firedrake@imperial.ac.uk> Date: Monday, 8 October 2018 at 14:43 To: firedrake <firedrake@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [firedrake] local discontinuity Dear Thomas, That should indeed be dS and not dx, thank you! Floriane ________________________________ De : firedrake-bounces@imperial.ac.uk <firedrake-bounces@imperial.ac.uk> de la part de Gibson, Thomas <t.gibson15@imperial.ac.uk> Envoyé : lundi 8 octobre 2018 14:34 À : firedrake Objet : Re: [firedrake] local discontinuity Dear Floriane, The error you're getting is due to the fact that you have an expression containing facet normals on a cell-wise integral. This one: `sigma_p*v_p*dot(grad(tmp_p),n_int)*4*avg(I_d)*avg(I_p)*dx` is the trouble-maker. Best regards, - Thomas ________________________________ From: firedrake-bounces@imperial.ac.uk <firedrake-bounces@imperial.ac.uk> on behalf of Floriane Gidel [RPG] <mmfg@leeds.ac.uk> Sent: 08 October 2018 14:18:09 To: firedrake Subject: Re: [firedrake] local discontinuity Dear David, I tried what you suggested and I have the following error when solving the Laplace equation: ufl.log.UFLException: Integral of type cell cannot contain a ReferenceNormal. I defined: V_d = FunctionSpace(mesh, "CG", 1) V_p = FunctionSpace(mesh, "CG", 1) W = V_d*V_p trial_d, trial_p = TrialFunction(W) v_d, v_p = TestFunction(W) result_mixed = Function(W) u_d, u_p = split(result_mixed) I define the normal pointing outward the disk interface as: n_vec = FacetNormal(mesh) n_int = I_d("+") * n_vec("+") + I_d("-") * n_vec("-") where I_d (and I_p) are the discontinuous (DG0) indicators defined as in Tomasz code. Then I define my weak forms as follows: A_u_d = sigma_d*dot(grad(trial_d),grad(v_d))*avg(I_d)*dx # Laplace in V_d A_u_p = sigma_p*dot(grad(trial_p),grad(v_p))*avg(I_p)*dx # Laplace in V_p L_u_d = sigma_d*v_d*dot(grad(tmp_d),n_int)*4*avg(I_d)*avg(I_p)*dx # interface L_u_p = -sigma_p*v_p*E*ds(domaine_bc_r) - sigma_p*v_p*dot(grad(tmp_p),n_int)*4*avg(I_d)*avg(I_p)*dx # right BC and interface A_u = A_u_d + A_u_p L_u = L_u_d + L_u_p cell_pb = LinearVariationalProblem(A_u, L_u, result_mixed) cell_solver = LinearVariationalSolver(cell_pb) cell_solver.solve() The full error is pasted below. Do you know where it comes from ? Thank you, Floriane UFL:ERROR Integral of type cell cannot contain a ReferenceNormal. Traceback (most recent call last): File "lin_cell.py", line 196, in <module> cell_solver = LinearVariationalSolver(cell_pb) File "/Users/mmfg/firedrake/src/firedrake/firedrake/variational_solver.py", line 286, in __init__ super(LinearVariationalSolver, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) File "/Users/mmfg/firedrake/src/firedrake/firedrake/variational_solver.py", line 156, in __init__ pre_function_callback=pre_f_callback) File "/Users/mmfg/firedrake/src/firedrake/firedrake/solving_utils.py", line 333, in __init__ form_compiler_parameters=fcp) File "/Users/mmfg/firedrake/src/firedrake/firedrake/assemble.py", line 143, in create_assembly_callable collect_loops=True) File "<decorator-gen-280>", line 2, in _assemble File "/Users/mmfg/firedrake/src/firedrake/firedrake/utils.py", line 62, in wrapper return f(*args, **kwargs) File "/Users/mmfg/firedrake/src/firedrake/firedrake/assemble.py", line 192, in _assemble kernels = tsfc_interface.compile_form(f, "form", parameters=form_compiler_parameters, inverse=inverse) File "/Users/mmfg/firedrake/src/firedrake/firedrake/tsfc_interface.py", line 193, in compile_form number_map).kernels File "/Users/mmfg/firedrake/src/PyOP2/pyop2/caching.py", line 200, in __new__ obj = make_obj() File "/Users/mmfg/firedrake/src/PyOP2/pyop2/caching.py", line 190, in make_obj obj.__init__(*args, **kwargs) File "/Users/mmfg/firedrake/src/firedrake/firedrake/tsfc_interface.py", line 112, in __init__ tree = tsfc_compile_form(form, prefix=name, parameters=parameters) File "/Users/mmfg/firedrake/src/tsfc/tsfc/driver.py", line 46, in compile_form fd = ufl_utils.compute_form_data(form) File "/Users/mmfg/firedrake/src/tsfc/tsfc/ufl_utils.py", line 56, in compute_form_data do_estimate_degrees=do_estimate_degrees, File "/Users/mmfg/firedrake/src/ufl/ufl/algorithms/compute_form_data.py", line 382, in compute_form_data _check_facet_geometry(self.integral_data) File "/Users/mmfg/firedrake/src/ufl/ufl/algorithms/compute_form_data.py", line 168, in _check_facet_geometry error("Integral of type %s cannot contain a %s." % (it, cls.__name__)) File "/Users/mmfg/firedrake/src/ufl/ufl/log.py", line 172, in error raise self._exception_type(self._format_raw(*message)) ufl.log.UFLException: Integral of type cell cannot contain a ReferenceNormal. ________________________________ De : firedrake-bounces@imperial.ac.uk <firedrake-bounces@imperial.ac.uk> de la part de Ham, David A <david.ham@imperial.ac.uk> Envoyé : vendredi 5 octobre 2018 15:56 À : firedrake Objet : Re: [firedrake] local discontinuity Dear Floriane, I think you can do this in a manner analogous to the way that Thomasz did fluid-structure interaction. We define a mixed function space with two continuous components: (V_d, V_p). We’re going to use the first component for the solution in the disk and the second component for the solution outside the disk. We further define two DG0 functions I_d and I_p such that I_d is 1 inside the disk and 0 outside, and I_p = 1 – I_d. You can now write the Laplace equation for the two parts using essentially normal Firedrake code except that you multiply the test function by the appropriate indicator function. This ensures that you only actually assemble integral contributions on the correct part of the domain. Now we just need the surface integral over the facets on the edge of the disk. Observe that this is the only place in the domain where both indicator functions are positive. You can write your jump integrals using the *dS measure. You can restrict the intervals to the relevant edges by multiplying the integrand by 4*avg(I_p)*avg(I_d). If W = V_d * V_p and u_d, u_p = TrialFunctions(W) then you can write the jump as: avg(u_d) – avg(u_p) The avg is mathematically unnecessary and does nothing, however in UFL all terminals that appear in dS integrals have to be restricted (you could just as well write u_d(‘+’) – u_p(‘+’)). Finally, when you come to the solve, you need to ensure that all the V_d nodes outside the disk are eliminated, and all the V_p nodes inside the disk too. You do this using the same DirichletBC subclassing trick which is in https://www.firedrakeproject.org/demos/linear_fluid_structure_interaction.py... Linear mixed fluid-structure interaction system ...<https://www.firedrakeproject.org/demos/linear_fluid_structure_interaction.py.html> www.firedrakeproject.org Linear mixed fluid-structure interaction system¶. This tutorial demonstrates the use of subdomain functionality and show how to describe a system consisting of multiple materials in Firedrake. I realise that is slightly involved, but it should work and the syntax will be fairly clean once you have done it. Feel free to ask for clarifications. Regards, David From: <firedrake-bounces@imperial.ac.uk> on behalf of "Floriane Gidel [RPG]" <mmfg@leeds.ac.uk> Reply-To: firedrake <firedrake@imperial.ac.uk> Date: Friday, 5 October 2018 at 15:33 To: firedrake <firedrake@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: [firedrake] local discontinuity Dear Firedrakers, I would like to solve equations in a domain made of two subdomains: - a disk, inside which test functions are continuous (Omega_d) - a plane around the disk, in which test functions are continuous (Omega_p) However, I would like the test functions to be discontinuous across the interface Gamma between the disk and the surrounding plane. This is to solve Laplace equation in each domain, augmented by a dynamic boundary condition on the jump between the two domains, that is Delta u = 0 in Omega_d Delta u = 0 in Omega_p partial_t [u] = ... on Gamma, where [u]= u(+)-u(-) is the jump Is there a way to define a functionspace on the full mesh, with continuous basis functions in each subdomain but discontinuous across the interface ? Or is there any better way to solve this kind of system ? Thank you for your help, Floriane