Colin: I know as I was comparing different theta's!
Francis: Oh I see that it does not allow to attach the mesh file to the email. Odd.
I attach the base file instead. I know it is a rectangle IHi FDs,
(i) The upwind example is odd in that the real boundaries are treated
in a special way rather than setting the outside value in
the same numerical flux as anywhere else;
my question is how this can be fixed?
So no special terms at the in- and outflow, just specify
the outside velocity used. This is imo the proper DG way not was is done
now.
(ii) Attached my attempt to do a time dependent advection
with Crank Nicolson, which works but does not yet
give the right answer, in part due to (i).
[I don't understand why I have to make
my theta variable that a constant but other wise it did not work.]
Any suggestions, corrections, also on other silly things done by me?
Next step is to extend to system with 3 equations;hence the few extra but unused variables.
Thanks, from midnight Seoul in old style Korean guesthouse.
Onno