Hi Onno,
  Did you see that you set theta to 0.0? If you want CN then it should be 0.5?

cheers
--cjc

On 25 June 2016 at 16:05, Onno Bokhove <O.Bokhove@leeds.ac.uk> wrote:

Hi FDs,


(i) The upwind example is odd in that the real boundaries are treated

in a special way rather than setting the outside value in

the same numerical flux as anywhere else;

my question is how this can be fixed?

So no special terms at the in- and outflow, just specify

the outside velocity used. This is imo the proper DG way not was is done

now.


(ii) Attached my attempt to do a time dependent advection

with Crank Nicolson, which works but does not yet

give the right answer, in part due to (i).


[I don't understand why I have to make

my theta variable that a constant but other wise it did not work.]


Any suggestions, corrections, also on other silly things done by me?

Next step is to extend to system with 3 equations;
hence the few extra but unused variables.

Thanks, from midnight Seoul in old style Korean guesthouse.

Onno




--
http://www.imperial.ac.uk/people/colin.cotter

www.cambridge.org/9781107663916