I will handle ext_bc_demo. It has an extruded mixed Helmholtz test in
development, IIRC.
On 25 March 2014 10:42, Bercea, Gheorghe-teodor <
gheorghe-teodor.bercea08(a)imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi Lawrence,
>
> As for my branches.
>
> - extrusion-facets-rhs (b)
> - rebased-efr (c)
> - extrusion-facets (d)
> - extrusion-documentation (b)
> - extrusion-mixed-bcs (d)
> - ext_bc_demo (d)
> - extrusion-vfs (c)
> - extrusion-vfs-new (c)
> - extrusion (c)
>
> Andrew, any objections on the extrusion-mixed-bcs and ext_bc_demo? Do you
> still want to have those two branches around?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Doru
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: firedrake-bounces(a)imperial.ac.uk [firedrake-bounces(a)imperial.ac.uk]
> on behalf of Lawrence Mitchell [lawrence.mitchell(a)imperial.ac.uk]
> Sent: 24 March 2014 14:59
> To: firedrake
> Subject: [firedrake] dmplex migration
>
> Dear firedrakers,
>
> if you've been paying attention recently, you'll have noticed we just
> transitioned to a dmplex based mesh infrastructure. Now would appear to be
> a good time to do a little bit of branch spring cleaning. For each of the
> branches listed please tell me if you would like it:
>
> (a) kept and pulled forward onto master (still under active development)
> (b) pulled forward onto master and proposed for merging
> (c) left alone (under development but you'll do it yourself)
> (d) removed (the branch is abandoned)
>
> I've organised the branches by "owner", that is the person who has made
> the most commits on it, but please check the entire list.
>
> David's branches:
>
> - form_cache is in (a), but already rebased
> - public_coordinates is in (b)
> - real-function-space
> Discussions suggest we need to actually implement these, but we probably
> need to sit down and think about how to do it properly.
> - wave-demo
> This made the video on the front page of the website, should probably be
> pulled forward and documented in the same way as the other demos.
>
> Doru's branches:
>
> - extrusion-facets-rhs
> This appears under active development as in in review I think
> - rebased-efr
> I think this is the same functionality as extrusion-facets-rhs but
> rebased on a different commit, abandon?
> - extrusion-facets
> Abandoned in favour of extrusion-facets-rhs?
> - extrusion-documentation
> In review but needing multiple fixes to text before merging
> - extrusion-mixed-bcs
> I think this is abandoned, it's got a blowing up discretisation of
> extruded linear boussinesq we wrote for the October gung-ho meeting.
> - ext_bc_demo
> no clue
> - extrusion-vfs
> Has some tests, I don't know if they're in master
> - extrusion-vfs-new
> has some tests and some IR-related changes.
> - extrusion
> has some tests
>
> Florian's branches:
>
> - split-forms
> Needs pulling forward and merging, I think.
> - split-kernels
> Abandoned in favour of split-forms?
> - fenics-1.3
> Needs to come forward I think
> - pytest-2.5.2
> Asks for newer pytest versions on travis
> - petsc-ppa
> Probably abandon ware, since we don't have petsc packages for now.
> - moar-lint
> Adds even tighter linking to travis
>
>
> Lawrence's branches:
>
> - more-nullspace
> In progress
> - matrix-free
> Needs updating to master, I don't know what state the stuff Rod has been
> working on is in, that may be a better bet.
> - blocked-matrices
> Abandon ware, will drop.
>
> Fabio's branches:
>
> - pyop2-ir-perf-eval
> A bunch of stuff implementing a benchmarking test suite I think.
>
> Colin's branches:
>
> - hydrostatic:
> A test case where the test and trial spaces differ. Colin, do you want
> to keep this one?
>
> Simon's branches:
>
> - firedrake-adjoint
> Various bits and pieces of firedrake-adjoint testing, I think this can
> be dropped.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Lawrence
>